From: "Kurt Borja" <kuurtb@gmail.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com,
"Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:09:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D7VT4O9N3KD3.3DK9CY1TODOMR@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc0f1964-ae37-4cfb-b5d2-da2e2a97e522@linux.intel.com>
On Mon Feb 17, 2025 at 3:58 AM -05, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2025, Kurt Borja wrote:
>
>> The `objs` suffix is reserved for user-space tools. Use the `y` suffix
>> instead, which is usually used for kernel drivers.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I based this patch on top of the for-next branch.
>>
>> Ilpo, if you prefer this patch to be based on top of the fixes branch,
>> let me know. I'd submit two separate patches, one for alienware-wmi, on
>> top of the for-next branch and one for the other drivers, on top of
>> fixes.
>
> Thanks for the fix.
>
> I took this through for-next branch to not make our lives unnecessarily
> complicated. If there would be only handful of -objs, I might have decide
> otherwise but this (wrong) pattern is really widespread so removing a few
> drops from the ocean is not going to sound us the finish line fanfare. But
> it's still an important step towards the right direction, regardless.
>
> TBH, I didn't know the distinction either until Andy explained it (and
> like you, would have just copied the pattern if one was readily
> available). But I've never really deep dived into the kernel's build
> system anyway.
I will finish the job for this subsystem, so no one copies this pattern
again :p
>
> I wonder why checkpatch doesn't catch it, or does it? At least there are
> no "objs" strings in its source.
It doesn't actually. Not even with --strict.
--
~ Kurt
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 21:45 Kurt Borja
2025-02-16 20:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-17 8:58 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-02-18 19:09 ` Kurt Borja [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D7VT4O9N3KD3.3DK9CY1TODOMR@gmail.com \
--to=kuurtb@gmail.com \
--cc=Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®