mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Louis Taylor" <louis@kragniz.eu>
To: "Louis Taylor" <louis@kragniz.eu>,
	"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>, "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: add support for openat(2)
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 09:20:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D86IQDQZRN67.95DLK0YYQE1A@kragniz.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D86I2TBQIPLZ.TCUUJWWM5DMO@kragniz.eu>

On Mon Mar 3, 2025 at 8:49 AM GMT, Louis Taylor wrote:
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static __attribute__((unused))
> > > +int openat(int dirfd, const char *path, int flags, ...)
> > > +{
> > > +	mode_t mode = 0;
> > > +
> > > +	if (flags & O_CREAT) {
> > > +		va_list args;
> > > +
> > > +		va_start(args, flags);
> > > +		mode = va_arg(args, int);
> >
> > mode_t instead of int?
>
> This implementation is yoinked directly from open() below. I have no
> opinions, but if it should be changed it should be changed in both
> functions.

Actually, maybe this openat function could just entirely drop the
varargs since compatibility is less of an issue, effectively going back
to the interface before a7604ba149e7 (tools/nolibc/sys: make open() take
a vararg on the 3rd argument, 2022-02-07) rather than copying the
current state.

      reply	other threads:[~2025-03-03  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-02 20:25 Louis Taylor
2025-03-02 22:24 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-03  8:49   ` Louis Taylor
2025-03-03  9:20     ` Louis Taylor [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D86IQDQZRN67.95DLK0YYQE1A@kragniz.eu \
    --to=louis@kragniz.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®