From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-10630.protonmail.ch (mail-10630.protonmail.ch [79.135.106.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49A3E230BC6 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2025 13:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.135.106.30 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741183145; cv=none; b=ZAetsFpfWDwlJ5Wgf5Fog2iOjOhnYEIP7LhMY21MRieR2eHGqMRK0pJz2CE6SbrfBWC8oys5p48umNBuL6zIDa7SVxyTtgWxKdSqg6zEVfSOjlCeOvy92FpGcyRJXz35JLgzrgAVw4TWKjyNuLgtpkGss8v2wgYF5M4eeYj1vZs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741183145; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oyXJ/FF9pCzdYnhyE2IfOhy8VspgwA0dC/fOH3+HNfc=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ICL1f7GrisI1v++3GSMnDH1QRy8M7bSyko7qsJlv+atXe/XeEPUnx23zfGaNAXDXJW6goeu4NWOcWFLF7Tx/qHB9FsJV72OXGT0bdqV7SJuefd7prUhqJVGo8pj2X26VQoUQZYkYIRGOovcxrkn3SDn2HSRY2IKQWo61SS07D7A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b=CYYBkqM7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=79.135.106.30 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b="CYYBkqM7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1741183141; x=1741442341; bh=oyXJ/FF9pCzdYnhyE2IfOhy8VspgwA0dC/fOH3+HNfc=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=CYYBkqM7hDMIoVe7IJIj6hkVhKB5Z9OxNE5HXvD0MEU9sT+ggSsLnHOfBu8m9+2c8 Hq0dC71N5v+lcoEZq5oALSylUopeyA5Bx07OmugyIAygVgbL85WU67vBt5Xljzy+Ov dSI+XRGkwmwds6OS03Yi0HyhONE0hp5eMDetEjCP0JdmKOrOtAtaQrhMVflxSXg+Lq 1IVlktLmRjorHr4UnTIVASskeqvpHl5JmkDF7hTjL9gHpESQWElXHZmijA9IYsrFtH OUYk7Lopzku9kymCpR/jjB5AtyBgqeOQm9SVlYEvPuvRxiVngK7hYPv/LgWvhOfhWH 5IkkWRuDti61w== Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 13:58:55 +0000 To: Miguel Ojeda , Andreas Hindborg From: Benno Lossin Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross , Danilo Krummrich , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/22] rust: pin-init: add miscellaneous files from the user-space version Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20250304225245.2033120-1-benno.lossin@proton.me> <5Q1xnRAO-CFSBw_RfcJwj_wKB2rd2Qcc2qFiWmrWjueSmkBd3T-BuqlHSyrMrGIu2loBNIJUTRmvwBk2hfoneA==@protonmail.internalid> <20250304225245.2033120-21-benno.lossin@proton.me> <87y0xjaat7.fsf@kernel.org> Feedback-ID: 71780778:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: f989164ccd17e1c1224db328b640b3b5f829f318 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed Mar 5, 2025 at 2:37 PM CET, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 2:08=E2=80=AFPM Andreas Hindborg wrote: >> >> But really, if you are already going to sync changes with automated >> tools, it should be simple enough to have a list of file that are >> excluded from user space to kernel syncs. > > As far as I understand, Benno already excludes some files -- so extra > files could also be excluded easily. > > Not sure about these though, e.g. they could help someone realize they > need to contribute/develop it elsewhere. On the other hand, we could > have a custom one in the kernel instead, explaining just that. CONTRIBUTING.md is also referenced by the MAINTAINERS entry in the `P:` field. For README.md, I don't mind removing it, as that still keeps the rules of which files should be synchronized simple (see the other thread). But I agree with Miguel that it is beneficial to keep in order to show that it is a vendored library. --- Cheers, Benno