On Wed May 7, 2025 at 6:56 PM CEST, Kendall Willis wrote:
> On 4/21/25 03:14, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
>> The CANUART pins of mcu_mcan0, mcu_mcan1, mcu_uart0 and wkup_uart0 are
>> powered during Partial-IO and IO+DDR and are capable of waking up the
>> system in these states. Specify the states in which these units can do a
>> wakeup on this board.
>> 
>> Note that the UARTs are not capable of wakeup in Partial-IO because of
>> of a UART mux on the board not being powered during Partial-IO.
>> 
>> Add pincontrol definitions for mcu_mcan0 and mcu_mcan1 for wakeup from
>> Partial-IO. Add these as wakeup pinctrl entries for both devices.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>> index 1c9d95696c839a51b607839abb9429a8de6fa620..724d9a6f3c575fe35496fdd9e17d6d8e33869f92 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>> @@ -741,3 +741,79 @@ dpi1_out: endpoint {
>>   		};
>>   	};
>>   };
>> +
>> +&mcu_mcan0 {
>> +	pinctrl-names = "default", "wakeup";
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan0_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_default>;
>> +	pinctrl-1 = <&mcu_mcan0_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_wakeup>;
>> +	wakeup-source = <&system_partial_io>,
>> +			<&system_io_ddr>,
>> +			<&system_deep_sleep>,
>> +			<&system_mcu_only>,
>> +			<&system_standby>;
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mcu_mcan1 {
>> +	pinctrl-names = "default", "wakeup";
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan1_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_default>;
>> +	pinctrl-1 = <&mcu_mcan1_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_wakeup>;
>> +	wakeup-source = <&system_partial_io>,
>> +			<&system_io_ddr>,
>> +			<&system_deep_sleep>,
>> +			<&system_mcu_only>,
>> +			<&system_standby>;
>> +	status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mcu_uart0 {
>> +	wakeup-source = <&system_io_ddr>,
>> +			<&system_deep_sleep>,
>> +			<&system_mcu_only>,
>> +			<&system_standby>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&wkup_uart0 {
>> +	wakeup-source = <&system_io_ddr>,
>> +			<&system_deep_sleep>,
>> +			<&system_mcu_only>,
>> +			<&system_standby>;
>> +};
> Hi Markus,
>
> I noticed wkup_uart0 is already referenced earlier in the dts. Could the 
> wakeup-source property be added into the first reference?
>> +
>> +&mcu_pmx0 {
> Same thing with mcu_pmx0. Is there a reason for separating it from when 
> it was referenced originally?
>> +	mcu_mcan0_tx_pins_default: mcu-mcan0-tx-default-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62X_IOPAD(0x034, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (D6) MCU_MCAN0_TX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_default: mcu-mcan0-rx-default-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62X_IOPAD(0x038, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (B3) MCU_MCAN0_RX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_wakeup: mcu-mcan0-rx-wakeup-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62X_IOPAD(0x038, PIN_INPUT | WKUP_EN, 0) /* (B3) MCU_MCAN0_RX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan1_tx_pins_default: mcu-mcan1-tx-default-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62X_IOPAD(0x03c, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (E5) MCU_MCAN1_TX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_default: mcu-mcan1-rx-default-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62X_IOPAD(0x040, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (D4) MCU_MCAN1_RX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_wakeup: mcu-mcan1-rx-wakeup-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62X_IOPAD(0x040, PIN_INPUT | WKUP_EN, 0) /* (D4) MCU_MCAN1_RX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +};Additionally, this patch does not apply cleanly to linux-next and needs 
> to be fixed and rebased.

Thank you, I will fix your points and rebase once the dt-schema
idle-state-name question is resolved.

Best
Markus