Re: [PATCH v4] drm/xe: Allow building as kernel built-in

[Harry Austen <hpausten@protonmail.com>]

On Mon May 19, 2025 at 4:14 PM BST, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 2025-05-16 12:42, Harry Austen wrote:
>> Fix Kconfig symbol dependency on KUNIT, which isn't actually required
>> for XE to be built-in. However, if KUNIT is enabled, it must be built-in
>> too.
>>
>> Also, allow DRM_XE_DISPLAY to be built-in. But only as long as DRM_I915
>> isn't, since that results in duplicate symbol errors.
>>
>> Fixes: 08987a8b6820 ("drm/xe: Fix build with KUNIT=m")
>> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Harry Austen <hpausten@protonmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> v4: Add Jani Nikula's Acked-by tag
>> v3: Simplify KUNIT dependency, as suggested by Jani Nikula
>> v2: Ensure DRM_XE_DISPLAY and DRM_I915 can't both be built-in
>>
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
>> index 9bce047901b22..214f40264fa12 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>  config DRM_XE
>>  	tristate "Intel Xe Graphics"
>> -	depends on DRM && PCI && MMU && (m || (y && KUNIT=y))
>> +	depends on DRM && PCI && MMU
>> +	depends on KUNIT || KUNIT=n
>>  	select INTERVAL_TREE
>>  	# we need shmfs for the swappable backing store, and in particular
>>  	# the shmem_readpage() which depends upon tmpfs
>> @@ -51,7 +52,7 @@ config DRM_XE
>>
>>  config DRM_XE_DISPLAY
>>  	bool "Enable display support"
>> -	depends on DRM_XE && DRM_XE=m && HAS_IOPORT
>> +	depends on DRM_XE && (DRM_XE=m || DRM_I915!=y) && HAS_IOPORT
>>  	select FB_IOMEM_HELPERS if DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION
>>  	select I2C
>>  	select I2C_ALGOBIT
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Thanks!

>
> Can we also get rid of the IOSF_MBI select? Not even xe_display depends on it, leftover from initial porting. :)

As this seems unrelated, I'd be happy to submit a separate patch for this
afterwards. Thanks for the suggestion.

Harry