From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745401B0F17; Tue, 3 Jun 2025 08:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748937728; cv=none; b=X5F5orVCGPLLnNYwxnWay9cVtF7jUxMmWxsC1656QvZEdhiDgFs+9X0WUoPgAwAEPARmfnRIWEeNwwXurJNEfdMqjmJvTLYC5ACwQzYJXrRknemYgoMhIJrbRvsB4x4FnOjreXeAg7JLZE6h5R/FlLQ/VQjMdLyUELCpNjVcCbQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748937728; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9kyAbRkks5+ZeEszHWClhbQsDXdyjmyLLfnOBp9lYlo=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=Yn+yYnFWdVuv+e4eKGEI6eTGUwNnjKngiNDhGIQjWXDxXzx3Sf11JKeQs+RUC84Vu7KGCEF1OVE6YzrQHpzExvbwIDESzrPQMUJAunDrIRwbQDJdTgvYt6zblrsU3MHCgSZy7Mbm8kywRJdpNtC4/S2TyIODYXx2nl0uREWmunM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=WDZSywUO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="WDZSywUO" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86E2A41B50; Tue, 3 Jun 2025 08:01:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1748937718; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=c7G1lvf/kPOiqMqyPQvfVR/3H4FSASJvUrGFFqPpIpw=; b=WDZSywUOCm9s0b7b7shrPqvPi/saxIBy0AB+0oGbYY/0GihVHZ/C7YgvSIQJt3kkYvn2X1 fJrUwi9wl+yFSnxps8kWvi5L3JDf5HYNuMICVUaIo9zbfbCRBBIfTcd1nwCioq2SAcHDlU ehIMlfXWkuygXwEe1tHLfrcJ+V7yz7Ph11ix2zr95pxcxG1pHD17Cs4ytyx75upwCYWcrY 6rxJAb8WKDlmzFO+effCCopvMD/Ts9B5Ai8tA2a+YmtQPS+uQTFn0udeFNUTCqXhp6xsxV BEe4+A3z7TYV9FLu1cMrk9pVUZcwPQk4ASzrZHld2X/VPj5YPkMZy50ZNFDuzQ== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 10:01:55 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" To: "Mark Brown" Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/11] regmap: irq: Add support for chips without separate IRQ status Cc: "Lee Jones" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Kamel Bouhara" , "Linus Walleij" , "Bartosz Golaszewski" , "Dmitry Torokhov" , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , "Michael Walle" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Danilo Krummrich" , , , , , , , =?utf-8?q?Gr=C3=A9gory_Clement?= , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Andy Shevchenko" X-Mailer: aerc 0.19.0-0-gadd9e15e475d References: <20250530-mdb-max7360-support-v10-0-ce3b9e60a588@bootlin.com> <20250530-mdb-max7360-support-v10-5-ce3b9e60a588@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -100 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgdegtddtudculddtuddrgeefvddrtddtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfitefpfffkpdcuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepggfgtgffkffhvffuvefofhgjsehtqhertdertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrthhhihgvuhcuffhusghoihhsqdeurhhirghnugdfuceomhgrthhhihgvuhdrughusghoihhsqdgsrhhirghnugessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheevtdekffeuleehkedtvdejhfeihfegtdduveeghedvveelgfevteekveelleetnecuffhomhgrihhnpegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmnecukfhppedvuddvrddutdehrdduhedtrddvhedvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepvdduvddruddthedrudehtddrvdehvddphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgrthhhihgvuhdrughusghoihhsqdgsrhhirghnugessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvdefpdhrtghpthhtohepsghrohhonhhivgeskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheplhgvvgeskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheprhhosghhsehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehkrhiikhdoughtsehkv ghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegtohhnohhrodgutheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepkhgrmhgvlhdrsghouhhhrghrrgessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhhsrdifrghllhgvihhjsehlihhnrghrohdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegsrhhglhessghguggvvhdrphhl X-GND-Sasl: mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com On Fri May 30, 2025 at 12:37 PM CEST, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:00:13PM +0200, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote: >> Some GPIO chips allow to rise an IRQ on GPIO level changes but do not >> provide an IRQ status for each separate line: only the current gpio >> level can be retrieved. >>=20 >> Add support for these chips, emulating IRQ status by comparing GPIO >> levels with the levels during the previous interrupt. > > Please do not submit new versions of already applied patches, please > submit incremental updates to the existing code. Modifying existing > commits creates problems for other users building on top of those > commits so it's best practice to only change pubished git commits if > absolutely essential. Sorry, the patch is still present in the series as I only rebased on 6.15, but it is unchanged from the previous series. So my understanding is I should have rebased on linux-next master branch instead, right? --=20 Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com