Re: [PATCH 4/4] regulator: qcom-rpmh: add support for pm7550 regulators

["Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>]

On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 3:03 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 7/9/25 1:56 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> On Wed Jun 25, 2025 at 4:20 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 6/25/25 4:10 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 6/25/25 11:18 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>>> Add RPMH regulators exposed by Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. PM7550 PMIC.
>>>>> It has 6 FTS525 (FT-SMPS) and 23 LDOs with 3 different types.
>>>>> L1-L11 are LDO515 LV NMOS, L12-L13 are LDO515 MV PMOS, L14-L23 are
>>>>> LDO512 MV PMOS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> FWIW everything you said in the commit message is correct, but I'm not
>>>> 100% sure how to map these LDO types to the existing definitions
>>>
>>> OK so found another page (also made sure that the supply maps are
>>> indeed OK)
>>>
>>> SMPS is OK
>>> L1-L11 is OK
>>> L14-23 is OK
>>>
>>> L12/13 -> pmic5_pldo515_mv
>> 
>> Based on what are you saying that?
>> 
>> Based on 80-62408-1 Rev. AG for the LDO515, the Output voltage range for
>> MV PMOS is "programmable range 1.504-3.544" which matches "pmic5_pldo".
>> 
>> But yes, in the table next to it, it's saying 1.8-3.3V, which matches
>> "pmic5_pldo515_mv".
>> 
>> If you're sure, I can update it but the datasheet is a bit confusing.
>> Let me know!
>
> I was looking at the same datasheet as you and took into account both
> the LDO type from e.g. Table 3-12 and the output ranges from Table 3-24

But why, looking at table 3-24, is there a mismatch between that text
"programmable range 1.504-3.544" and the table on the right saying
min 1.8 and max 3.3V?

Programmable range sounds more like what we'd want? No clue...

>
> Konrad