From: "Christopher Snowhill" <kode54@gmail.com>
To: "Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
"Christopher Snowhill" <chris@kode54.net>,
"Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>,
"Leo (Sunpeng) Li" <Sunpeng.Li@amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Enable async flip for cursor planes
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 16:21:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DC3DXWOJ6E18.HVR7WZZCRV6F@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_MdosN34TH=L3Zv1K2_Lroa8Y69JK1wy_zbBFRDT-Q=4Q@mail.gmail.com>
This may be a more appropriate patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20250723150413.18445-1-xaver.hugl@kde.org/
On Fri Aug 15, 2025 at 6:17 AM PDT, Alex Deucher wrote:
> @Wentland, Harry
> , @Leo (Sunpeng) Li Can you guys take a look? This patch fixes a regression.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:33 AM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> + Harry, Leo
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 9:38 AM Christopher Snowhill <chris@kode54.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon Jun 23, 2025 at 4:06 AM PDT, Christopher Snowhill wrote:
>> > > On Mon Jun 23, 2025 at 3:46 AM PDT, Christopher Snowhill wrote:
>> > >> On Fri Jun 20, 2025 at 3:10 AM PDT, Christopher Snowhill wrote:
>> > >>> Here's another alternative change, which may be more thorough. It does
>> > >>> seem to fix the issue, at least. The issue does indeed appear to be
>> > >>> no-op plane changes sent to the cursor plane.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> If anyone wants to propose style changes, and suggest a proper commit
>> > >>> message, if this is indeed a welcome fix for the problem, please let me
>> > >>> know.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
>> > >>> index c2726af6698e..b741939698e8 100644
>> > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
>> > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
>> > >>> @@ -1087,17 +1087,22 @@ int drm_atomic_set_property(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> > >>> }
>> > >>>
>> > >>> /* ask the driver if this non-primary plane is supported */
>> > >>> - if (plane->type != DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY) {
>> > >>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> > >>> + else if (plane->type != DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY) {
>> > >>> + ret = drm_atomic_plane_get_property(plane, plane_state,
>> > >>> + prop, &old_val);
>> > >>> +
>> > >>> + if (ret || old_val != prop_value) {
>> > >>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - if (plane_funcs && plane_funcs->atomic_async_check)
>> > >>> - ret = plane_funcs->atomic_async_check(plane, state, true);
>> > >>> + if (plane_funcs && plane_funcs->atomic_async_check)
>> > >>> + ret = plane_funcs->atomic_async_check(plane, state, true);
>> > >>>
>> > >>> - if (ret) {
>> > >>> - drm_dbg_atomic(prop->dev,
>> > >>> - "[PLANE:%d:%s] does not support async flips\n",
>> > >>> - obj->id, plane->name);
>> > >>> - break;
>> > >>> + if (ret) {
>> > >>> + drm_dbg_atomic(prop->dev,
>> > >>> + "[PLANE:%d:%s] does not support async flips\n",
>> > >>> + obj->id, plane->name);
>> > >>> + break;
>> > >>> + }
>> > >>> }
>> > >>> }
>> > >>> }
>> > >>
>> > >> Upon further testing and reflection, I have come to the conclusion that
>> > >> this is indeed best handled by a kernel fix, rather than breaking user
>> > >> space.
>> > >>
>> > >> I attempted to work around this in wlroots, adjusting 0.18, 0.19, and
>> > >> 0.20 git with similar patches. First I attempted to stash all the
>> > >> written properties for the atomic code, storing an initial value of all
>> > >> 0xFE so it was always likely to write the first time, and only setting a
>> > >> property if it changed from the last commit.
>> > >>
>> > >> This resulted in whole commits breaking for one or both framebuffers
>> > >> until I ctrl-alt-fx switched to a tty and back again, and this would
>> > >> work again temporarily.
>> > >>
>> > >> So I went back to the drawing board and only withheld seemingly
>> > >> duplicate plane properties. This "worked", until I attempted to play a
>> > >> game, and then it started glitching spectacularly, and not updating at
>> > >> all if the game was doing direct scanout and vrr.
>> > >>
>> > >> Clearly this is wrong.
>> > >>
>> > >> The wlroots library queues up properties for each commit. On every
>> > >> commit where the cursor is disabled, it queues up both fb_id=0 and
>> > >> crtc_id=0. Every commit. Is this wrong? Should it only be queueing up
>> > >> the disablement properties once? It also queues up the full plane and
>> > >> hotspot properties when enabled, even if the cursor doesn't change
>> > >> position or appearance.
>> > >
>> > > Probably should have CC'd the drm misc maintainers when I started poking
>> > > drm misc instead of amdgpu. Pity there isn't a list for that...
>> >
>> > I am a dumbass, I didn't notice get_maintainer.pl. Added more people,
>> > and the correct list. Not sure if I should remove amd-gfx, since this
>> > affects them, somewhat...
>> >
>> > However, the intention of this thread was to seek commentary on the
>> > situation as it is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-15 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250619125507.54384-1-kode54@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <DARA1U86AS72.QOIEVZWCFPYC@kode54.net>
[not found] ` <DATUOZZD8316.2INSL3KL5RA80@kode54.net>
[not found] ` <DATV4CAOHVGV.1UJ803EX21II6@gmail.com>
2025-06-23 13:38 ` Christopher Snowhill
2025-06-23 15:33 ` Alex Deucher
2025-08-15 13:17 ` Alex Deucher
2025-08-15 23:21 ` Christopher Snowhill [this message]
2025-08-15 16:11 ` Leo Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DC3DXWOJ6E18.HVR7WZZCRV6F@gmail.com \
--to=kode54@gmail.com \
--cc=Harry.Wentland@amd.com \
--cc=Sunpeng.Li@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@kode54.net \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®