From: "Markus Schneider-Pargmann" <msp@baylibre.com>
To: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan" <rcsekar@samsung.com>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>,
"Patrik Flykt" <patrik.flykt@linux.intel.com>,
"Dong Aisheng" <b29396@freescale.com>,
"Fengguang Wu" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
"Varka Bhadram" <varkabhadram@gmail.com>,
"Wu Bo" <wubo.oduw@gmail.com>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] can: m_can: m_can_handle_state_errors(): fix CAN state transition to Error Active
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 10:49:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DC74JEKBB6HL.1LJ53UZJ0T0Q9@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250812-m_can-fix-state-handling-v1-3-b739e06c0a3b@pengutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3986 bytes --]
Hi,
On Tue Aug 12, 2025 at 7:36 PM CEST, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> The CAN Error State is determined by the receive and transmit error
> counters. The CAN error counters decrease when reception/transmission
> is successful, so that a status transition back to the Error Active
> status is possible. This transition is not handled by
> m_can_handle_state_errors().
>
> Add the missing detection of the Error Active state to
> m_can_handle_state_errors() and extend the handling of this state in
> m_can_handle_state_change().
>
> Fixes: e0d1f4816f2a ("can: m_can: add Bosch M_CAN controller support")
> Fixes: cd0d83eab2e0 ("can: m_can: m_can_handle_state_change(): fix state change")
> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> index a51dc0bb8124..b485d2f3d971 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> @@ -812,6 +812,10 @@ static int m_can_handle_state_change(struct net_device *dev,
> u32 timestamp = 0;
>
> switch (new_state) {
> + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE:
> + /* error active state */
This comment and the one below don't really help IMHO.
> + cdev->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> + break;
> case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
> /* error warning state */
> cdev->can.can_stats.error_warning++;
> @@ -841,6 +845,13 @@ static int m_can_handle_state_change(struct net_device *dev,
> __m_can_get_berr_counter(dev, &bec);
>
> switch (new_state) {
> + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE:
> + /* error active state */
> + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL | CAN_ERR_CNT;
> + cf->data[1] = CAN_ERR_CRTL_ACTIVE;
> + cf->data[6] = bec.txerr;
> + cf->data[7] = bec.rxerr;
> + break;
> case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING:
> /* error warning state */
> cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL | CAN_ERR_CNT;
> @@ -877,30 +888,29 @@ static int m_can_handle_state_change(struct net_device *dev,
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static enum can_state
> +m_can_can_state_get_by_psr(const u32 psr)
> +{
> + if (psr & PSR_BO)
> + return CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF;
> + if (psr & PSR_EP)
> + return CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE;
> + if (psr & PSR_EW)
> + return CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING;
Why should m_can_handle_state_errors() should be called if none of these
flags are set?
m_can_handle_state_errors() seems to only be called if IR_ERR_STATE
which is defined as:
#define IR_ERR_STATE (IR_BO | IR_EW | IR_EP)
This is the for the interrupt register but will the PSR register bits be
set without the interrupt register being set?
Best
Markus
> +
> + return CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> +}
> +
> static int m_can_handle_state_errors(struct net_device *dev, u32 psr)
> {
> struct m_can_classdev *cdev = netdev_priv(dev);
> - int work_done = 0;
> + enum can_state new_state;
>
> - if (psr & PSR_EW && cdev->can.state != CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING) {
> - netdev_dbg(dev, "entered error warning state\n");
> - work_done += m_can_handle_state_change(dev,
> - CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING);
> - }
> + new_state = m_can_can_state_get_by_psr(psr);
> + if (new_state == cdev->can.state)
> + return 0;
>
> - if (psr & PSR_EP && cdev->can.state != CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE) {
> - netdev_dbg(dev, "entered error passive state\n");
> - work_done += m_can_handle_state_change(dev,
> - CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE);
> - }
> -
> - if (psr & PSR_BO && cdev->can.state != CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF) {
> - netdev_dbg(dev, "entered error bus off state\n");
> - work_done += m_can_handle_state_change(dev,
> - CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF);
> - }
> -
> - return work_done;
> + return m_can_handle_state_change(dev, new_state);
> }
>
> static void m_can_handle_other_err(struct net_device *dev, u32 irqstatus)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 289 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-20 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-12 17:36 [PATCH 0/7] can: m_can: fix pm_runtime and CAN state handling Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/7] can: m_can: m_can_plat_remove(): add missing pm_runtime_disable() Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-19 8:22 ` Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2025-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] can: m_can: m_can_rx_handler(): only handle active interrupts Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-19 8:29 ` Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2025-09-09 14:07 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] can: m_can: m_can_handle_state_errors(): fix CAN state transition to Error Active Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-20 8:49 ` Markus Schneider-Pargmann [this message]
2025-08-20 9:09 ` Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2025-09-09 14:28 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-09-09 14:31 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-09-09 14:38 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-09-09 14:25 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] can: m_can: m_can_chip_config(): bring up interface in correct state Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-20 9:00 ` Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2025-09-09 14:48 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] can: m_can: fix CAN state in system PM Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-20 9:06 ` Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2025-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] can: m_can: m_can_get_berr_counter(): don't wake up controller if interface is down Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-12 17:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] can: m_can: add optional support for reset Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-13 8:17 ` Philipp Zabel
2025-08-13 8:34 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-13 8:44 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-08-13 8:17 ` [PATCH 0/7] can: m_can: fix pm_runtime and CAN state handling Philipp Zabel
2025-08-13 9:06 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DC74JEKBB6HL.1LJ53UZJ0T0Q9@baylibre.com \
--to=msp@baylibre.com \
--cc=b29396@freescale.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=patrik.flykt@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rcsekar@samsung.com \
--cc=varkabhadram@gmail.com \
--cc=wubo.oduw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®