From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A95752F56 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 15:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760456306; cv=none; b=ZpEZh/Po0w7BNZRqA9qv1/BTiBUWou1OUDqU06wuUOwxiQtQ7Bs2tlesMPYprUpPT0KKfEABBlNMj592JS9aQAKvGlyXmSAP8n4QWQ16gcJ7PJakV8X5ECS0RYH0Gg4eR4AXNUiA9SM5ZGLRe3sTBA2bDcfDvkkIUSOVpCmRPi0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760456306; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q/WXLPQSkMRoyEVZFpT4T/dKh8qmtV542z46Ju4P4PQ=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:Subject:Cc:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=iHEc1Kk4l+sSd8rzLNhYWnYuA+vpEZVCPLj5RrdKK9OvBwEAiBLVe+SFRQ9TcL8O2FNzlVVaCU9y9sFueaWAloKWISCD7ouUo4EdPU0DOuLceJxqIv5wJtazudt5lcSxLyIbGEXpwo4NgLRVj2vEzrlB2Vxelzfc0LIZ1h39tKg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=IFUZeWse; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="IFUZeWse" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBFE4C09F94; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 15:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2059606EC; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 15:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 71D02102F22A4; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:38:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1760456301; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=q/WXLPQSkMRoyEVZFpT4T/dKh8qmtV542z46Ju4P4PQ=; b=IFUZeWse8HRhQFNtoBGScDbnJkoQPZcRUWyOenFV6hXjNstqT2i9PMmh1s7H/PcwmR4iYV HQ3euPHogyYNwvo08rWjjdckhpPEOok6iGD/VPNfs8oZIrRfIkloH5tkuwgAyMNJXgelPh dVhbCY93z8z4CStvKKER0aQ2C7zrIHFSMixiYFFEb098b6baDoHaKmkshcVGO9LywkQt0C 4yeIOsUXZ4y2hVaD+/JbXGcxno17v311yi1BNfCzIBPSwakyvdXZANQ8RhIX6oTjFKr4KE azyLrV+7p0S7kUal3JHaLt15/5JYSbB5dLV6PSnVRAwa80rllD59ZaUuqg27cg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:38:10 +0200 Message-Id: From: =?utf-8?q?Th=C3=A9o_Lebrun?= Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 0/5] net: macb: various fixes Cc: "Andrew Lunn" , "David S. Miller" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Paolo Abeni" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Nicolas Ferre" , "Claudiu Beznea" , "Geert Uytterhoeven" , "Harini Katakam" , "Richard Cochran" , "Russell King" , , , , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Tawfik Bayouk" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Sean Anderson" To: "Jakub Kicinski" , =?utf-8?q?Th=C3=A9o_Lebrun?= X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2 References: <20250923-macb-fixes-v6-0-772d655cdeb6@bootlin.com> <20250926134056.383c57a2@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250926134056.383c57a2@kernel.org> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On Fri Sep 26, 2025 at 10:40 PM CEST, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 09:56:25 +0200 Th=C3=A9o Lebrun wrote: >> What's the state of maintainers minds for this series? It has been >> stable for some time, tested on sam9x75 (by Nicolas Ferre) & EyeQ5 >> and Simon Horman has added his reviewed-by this morning (thanks!). >> But of course I am biased. > > We'll get to it.. having the revisions a few days apart rather than=20 > a few weeks apart helps maintainers remember the details, and generally > leads to lower wait times. FWIW. ACK! I'll make sure to stay on track for the next ones. It hadn't occurred to me that maintainers do forget, which sounds dumb once written out loud. Thanks Jakub, -- Th=C3=A9o Lebrun, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com