Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Set wakeup-source system-states

["Markus Schneider-Pargmann" <msp@baylibre.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4382 bytes --]

Hi Kendall,

On Tue Nov 11, 2025 at 9:57 PM CET, Kendall Willis wrote:
> On 11/3/25 06:39, Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI.com) wrote:
>> The CANUART pins of mcu_mcan0, mcu_mcan1, mcu_uart0 and wkup_uart0 are
>> powered during Partial-IO and I/O Only + DDR and are capable of waking
>> up the system in these states. Specify the states in which these units
>> can do a wakeup on this board.
>> 
>> Note that the UARTs are not capable of wakeup in Partial-IO because of
>> of a UART mux on the board not being powered during Partial-IO.
>> 
>> Add pincontrol definitions for mcu_mcan0 and mcu_mcan1 for wakeup from
>> Partial-IO. Add these as wakeup pinctrl entries for both devices.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann (TI.com) <msp@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>> index af591fe6ae4f0a91991d2904a9a61905a0eeb614..b61370db6986308ec97983f796b993a26debcabc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>> @@ -233,6 +233,10 @@ AM62AX_MCU_IOPAD(0x0030, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (C8) WKUP_UART0_RTSn */
>>   &wkup_uart0 {
>>   	pinctrl-names = "default";
>>   	pinctrl-0 = <&wkup_uart0_pins_default>;
>> +	wakeup-source = <&system_io_ddr>,
>> +			<&system_deep_sleep>,
>> +			<&system_mcu_only>,
>> +			<&system_standby>;
>>   	status = "reserved";
>>   };
>>   
>> @@ -426,6 +430,42 @@ pmic_irq_pins_default: pmic-irq-default-pins {
>>   			AM62AX_MCU_IOPAD(0x000, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* (E11) MCU_GPIO0_0 */
>>   		>;
>>   	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan0_tx_pins_default: mcu-mcan0-tx-default-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62AX_MCU_IOPAD(0x034, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (D6) MCU_MCAN0_TX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_default: mcu-mcan0-rx-default-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62AX_MCU_IOPAD(0x038, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (B3) MCU_MCAN0_RX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_wakeup: mcu-mcan0-rx-wakeup-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62AX_MCU_IOPAD(0x038, PIN_INPUT | PIN_WKUP_EN, 0) /* (B3) MCU_MCAN0_RX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan1_tx_pins_default: mcu-mcan1-tx-default-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62AX_MCU_IOPAD(0x03c, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (E5) MCU_MCAN1_TX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_default: mcu-mcan1-rx-default-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62AX_MCU_IOPAD(0x040, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (D4) MCU_MCAN1_RX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_wakeup: mcu-mcan1-rx-wakeup-pins {
>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> +			AM62AX_MCU_IOPAD(0x040, PIN_INPUT | PIN_WKUP_EN, 0) /* (D4) MCU_MCAN1_RX */
>> +		>;
>> +	};
>>   };
>>   
>>   &mcu_gpio0 {
>> @@ -852,4 +892,33 @@ AM62AX_IOPAD(0x008, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (J24) OSPI0_DQS */
>>   	};
>>   };
>>   
>> +&mcu_mcan0 {
>> +	pinctrl-names = "default", "wakeup";
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan0_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_default>;
>> +	pinctrl-1 = <&mcu_mcan0_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_wakeup>;
>> +	wakeup-source = <&system_partial_io>,
>> +			<&system_io_ddr>,
>> +			<&system_deep_sleep>,
>> +			<&system_mcu_only>,
>> +			<&system_standby>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mcu_mcan1 {
>> +	pinctrl-names = "default", "wakeup";
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan1_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_default>;
>> +	pinctrl-1 = <&mcu_mcan1_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_wakeup>;
>> +	wakeup-source = <&system_partial_io>,
>> +			<&system_io_ddr>,
>> +			<&system_deep_sleep>,
>> +			<&system_mcu_only>,
>> +			<&system_standby>;
>> +};
>
> Did you mean to set the status = "okay" for mcu_mcan0 and mcu_mcan1? The 
> nodes would still be disabled without it since in k3-am62a-mcu.dtsi the 
> status is set to "disabled". Same goes for the patch you sent for AM62P.

Thanks for your reviews. Yes, I removed it after I got his feedback from
Vignesh:

  MCU peripherals are under control of MCU R5 which would be running a
  safety application on AM62A class of SoC. So these peripherals should
  not be enabled by default here.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/32b13258-19dd-4ba7-a13b-daaf3804a7c8@ti.com/

Best
Markus

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 289 bytes --]