From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (mail-wr1-f49.google.com [209.85.221.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED0793148BF for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765463113; cv=none; b=Ki/W9317+J/SNTDIp+Inc9qU1zzwkqa3icJjMaZKpnr5ANwVa/wXDfEe/tJLONM9ogIBtzPE0761UCqAOesiU9Kqrhc+3YSSgSE/pfqFLZ5edxqPAXeM+EIWqQb6ds1eoDXJ5XJZ0/3cEJZ/6BhbMfEfXgpCvJOeE4uBJM9R0O4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765463113; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JfNvq6okLmAVJxXk0CdmJsFS7cXDJb/i1MZ0ORrxZZM=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=J08F1ZBKN80XPlRNrfCU4FTgrMs6OPDOcyVNGWjXXuT7ND7tiSkSWGGS2Ghhx38oGhP8YgFocnBzPFq/Mq0aDNNYqZl1W+o08m9g17LQDbhUw3MGCSTAIlAtozEBLMb5w2zPWj9apIdSRf90CU0/uaX8C2T0JMt2wLrZcQ7FYdw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=FYGFMJ5i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="FYGFMJ5i" Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-42e2e77f519so75365f8f.2 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 06:25:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1765463109; x=1766067909; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ypzGs37g1ijizc80SSvmoAUEXXtetijEMnbM5bEMyAY=; b=FYGFMJ5iS4E08rzM4e0pqC2kLkDbb50XgMau0RaPUjhN6BdBNlLWX42c0n3M85g554 SC8Qnpt/iqENWR6g1YD8pm5SvgDuMhYbcptWRxeAzPIJnX60Db4Neg/ZVraHlUvbFDPO liOcXnbnTRp8rIF7G+LBHEG9PWTLfcdusN2h4ns1mBM4zmDV0FxFGiIxB6hUQSO3XIA+ OaOy6T+cgZvr3EuoejW3ileIjwcefCOAhzP/9WwNXrIX+M75+YAv3P+cH0NGyaNGNabB pSwivu7fm2d1WGMt/FoMEAiVZU6S8Q1H2TUfZKV08fTN9B5Gg2s6Mcyrr+Tz0K8ji5Pg 2QsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1765463109; x=1766067909; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ypzGs37g1ijizc80SSvmoAUEXXtetijEMnbM5bEMyAY=; b=f5iNdMIpm6HAU6ECz33owGlIzk8pFrOTh3qsKT7M3eC2RONzdz6eBKpgea1ThOed9W PQFgX9vpLhsiuwLGJNvI8gMC9/wsLtCwnE5Zo5yFho5/Mx+HLhB4jirtMHLKLY1RRjdc JTxsOZ42AZmEpW9POFDsuzjLDxnAmkENTYOi/lHzvbHY4qE83u+M3b2o3SgDzjjBUwQU F3bZLBV58tfJoQi4SMghslp8GzM3Ka0qa85euukBeRQBulQDRtvqqrOzbCTqgLIc4WyI +54HpnRhIcB/fyqpZ66kb28KZYK+LWPbstvY2hwwJkYP8zvewIdmWD6nIoO3NAJc1Y3a 4c8A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW0/iKHHinqF4BPoHXEFgGNpqJuwCFAF6bBiA1WwIX2zCBJxtaq92AqYVJKZK9qhmOt+1Z4IracFPE1SXE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzVaY52sgFXZd5ZVeFCsGgmz5TMB83M1NJhyByHg2hWX1lrFku/ fIBEgUn5n+ojjNc/VEM9bhEljwIT5kUFZEy13dP3YGK0ve/eNgCCyH4ygHgZ+phwhLo= X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX7zF/r/DAWltR7DWDhCToymT5C+fwj/QQdKimOEf2dyjic5+zRqu/TeCrVaW7J LoirY+7cvGo89Ad/wRYcG4ckIA5zrkjwcWOkvwRfkz0FGCAO8R95slN9j/dKm6Xw/WmoFdyzVzB A0FnhhUa65/EO7BgqLgycRm82x74ib1Th4YzeccLNDCPaoKrnhSnl2jjrwwvqCNRoHhHsX8Ike0 g/ruE9NhIfbR5EB9P0PygYhZd+Na1yozgPGTUSLBt4k9ZYloPLEP1P7eAHx9MZThQAtw8yx6fay fmw3fK9hZPQUFyEGtQVih+c1nfYuITSEs6EJOQGpnMEHk9O0RWk351k2b/4NIOx0vq2FjqaXIS7 p0NSiNw0Iwl3NWjIJig/1sh+N96jYmuIdEiKNZUw9KZF/A4DjjJt52tBGhaeVh942l5UxsaTfAc WXf272Ld78vs33crJh X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFqWEN8sqh579V/27ddTYiJenJl8LmZUFBNlJ5nqwZi4FWTc0j4oMC+Tm+I3rDoAG2WVaNLlw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:26cf:b0:42f:9e75:85f7 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-42fa39db068mr6789670f8f.28.1765463109070; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 06:25:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2a02:c7c:5e34:8000:c186:ec41:4ac0:f434]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-42fa8a6fd62sm6467992f8f.10.2025.12.11.06.25.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Dec 2025 06:25:08 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:25:08 +0000 Message-Id: Cc: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Increase MAX_OPPS to 64 From: "Alexey Klimov" To: "Sudeep Holla" , "Vivek Aknurwar" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20251014073454.461999-1-vivek.aknurwar@oss.qualcomm.com> <6af5945e-7d5c-4596-ac42-c5898b4c49b7@oss.qualcomm.com> <20251211-masterful-caterpillar-of-love-bc2d4c@sudeepholla> <20251211-wandering-magnificent-yak-5fb19e@sudeepholla> In-Reply-To: <20251211-wandering-magnificent-yak-5fb19e@sudeepholla> On Thu Dec 11, 2025 at 2:07 PM GMT, Sudeep Holla wrote: [..] >> > Ah good point on confusing commit message. I just assumed it is limita= tion >> > of the implementation. I can update the log when applying. It is not s= pec >> > or protocol limitation for sure. >> > >> > How about this ? >> > >> > | firmware: arm_scmi: Increase performance MAX_OPPS limit to 64 >> > | >> > | Some platforms expose more than 32 operating performance points (O= PPs) >> > | per performance domain via the SCMI performance protocol, but the >> > | driver currently limits the number of OPPs it can handle to 32 via >> > | MAX_OPPS. >> > | >> > | Bump MAX_OPPS to 64 so that these platforms can register all their >> > | performance levels. This is an internal limit in the driver only a= nd >> > | does not affect the SCMI protocol ABI. >> > | >> > | 64 is chosen as the next power of two above the existing limit. >>=20 >> Yeah, that sounds better :) >>=20 > Thanks! > >> I also thought that this was a driver limitation, not the protocol/spec = one >> as stated in the original patch. >>=20 >> I don't mind updating the commit message like this (but I am not the aut= hor >> of the original patch). >>=20 > Vivek, are you happy with the above edited commit message ? FWIW, with updated commit message feel free to use: Reviewed-by: Alexey Klimov Best regards, Alexey