From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.flyingcircus.io (mail.flyingcircus.io [212.122.41.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C201154BFF; Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.122.41.197 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732181446; cv=none; b=DIG7D50ZHEBrOxz1Asz1WOsu4eGOqldDw3KDVR1pdC+5cCrCkXxXrcnPhsSam/8eE9h9n/S7uWYW2iQ9gNn+ighg84nPB3ukFh3GyfMEHNa6GNBjaaqxL+w9oTWRVuIf5ntgQfZdVBPhpQAw8dme9sxByfpqsi8+3bG/2qKYDgw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732181446; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kY6ATH4jDYJl+37Zh0x1guou/Yjv6FBOF7eBV4sdsCE=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Message-Id:References:To; b=MVxdABSgg+HZJnfCcKbKFrttenGnfQPfQXU6tBCW0XS25AMnPqWdXvFkzo4clSrT8j7R9KTS7dWN3JYomgyvF2jGfXarLHwBaCxBohAoU3+X4+VFPejwTsrN0UzCK1JAmVyvRgbKxXy2yK/8Vz8xNX6Y9kqPDPPKhOOx7rvOfuk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=flyingcircus.io; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flyingcircus.io; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=flyingcircus.io header.i=@flyingcircus.io header.b=BcJ0f6/J; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.122.41.197 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=flyingcircus.io Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flyingcircus.io Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=flyingcircus.io header.i=@flyingcircus.io header.b="BcJ0f6/J" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=flyingcircus.io; s=mail; t=1732181434; bh=kY6ATH4jDYJl+37Zh0x1guou/Yjv6FBOF7eBV4sdsCE=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=BcJ0f6/J+1pW7RwIGqCAAaqMH4Rtw5RB9VY102dzq+f6kYMfyb1FKnETiV3m9ErcE QAfHtFDhbrMpey4196AdXTiM3G4aZCESnQnvap78V72Gunr8JNHcP7Rjfq+ad9mIBi 6xP6xRoWypzFzy7EVubB4bYr+EXIanJRHrusfHBI= Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.200.121\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH md-6.13 4/5] md/raid5: implement pers->bitmap_sector() From: Christian Theune In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:30:13 +0100 Cc: Jinpu Wang , Haris Iqbal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, song@kernel.org, xni@redhat.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, =?utf-8?Q?Florian-Ewald_M=C3=BCller?= , "yukuai (C)" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20241119152939.158819-1-jinpu.wang@ionos.com> To: Yu Kuai Hi, > On 21. Nov 2024, at 09:33, Yu Kuai wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > =E5=9C=A8 2024/11/21 16:10, Jinpu Wang =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 4:29=E2=80=AFPM Jack Wang = wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi Kuai, >>>=20 >>> We will test on our side and report back. >> Hi Kuai, >> Haris tested the new patchset, and it works fine. >> Thanks for the work. >=20 > Thanks for the test! And just to be sure, the BUG_ON() problem in the > other thread is not triggered as well, right? >=20 > +CC Christian >=20 > Are you able to test this set for lastest kernel? I have scheduled testing for later today. My current plan was to try = Xiao Ni=E2=80=99s fix on 6.6 as that did fix it on 6.11 for me. Which way forward makes more sense now? Are those two patches = independent or amalgamated or might they be stepping on each others=E2=80=99= toes? Christian --=20 Christian Theune =C2=B7 ct@flyingcircus.io =C2=B7 +49 345 219401 0 Flying Circus Internet Operations GmbH =C2=B7 https://flyingcircus.io Leipziger Str. 70/71 =C2=B7 06108 Halle (Saale) =C2=B7 Deutschland HR Stendal HRB 21169 =C2=B7 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Christian Theune, = Christian Zagrodnick