mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
To: "Kory Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
	"Felix Gu" <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul Kocialkowski" <paulk@sys-base.io>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Paul Kocialkowski" <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/logicvc: Fix device node reference leak in logicvc_drm_config_parse()
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 18:51:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DG5INIQWWPJV.31PV8URRWUZF6@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260203143531.1ab9a19c@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>

On Tue Feb 3, 2026 at 2:35 PM CET, Kory Maincent wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 10:57:47 +0100
> Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:21:19 +0800
>> Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > The logicvc_drm_config_parse() function calls of_get_child_by_name() to
>> > find the "layers" node but fails to release the reference, leading to a
>> > device node reference leak.
>> >
>> > Fix this by using the __free(device_node) cleanup attribute to automatic
>> > release the reference when the variable goes out of scope.
>> >
>> > Fixes: efeeaefe9be5 ("drm: Add support for the LogiCVC display controller")
>> > Signed-off-by: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/logicvc/logicvc_drm.c | 4 ++--
>> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/logicvc/logicvc_drm.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/logicvc/logicvc_drm.c index 204b0fee55d0..bbebf4fc7f51
>> > 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/logicvc/logicvc_drm.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/logicvc/logicvc_drm.c
>> > @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ static int logicvc_drm_config_parse(struct logicvc_drm
>> > *logicvc) struct device *dev = drm_dev->dev;
>> >  	struct device_node *of_node = dev->of_node;
>> >  	struct logicvc_drm_config *config = &logicvc->config;
>> > -	struct device_node *layers_node;
>> >  	int ret;
>> >
>> >  	logicvc_of_property_parse_bool(of_node,
>> > LOGICVC_OF_PROPERTY_DITHERING, @@ -128,7 +127,8 @@ static int
>> > logicvc_drm_config_parse(struct logicvc_drm *logicvc) if (ret)
>> >  		return ret;
>> >
>> > -	layers_node = of_get_child_by_name(of_node, "layers");
>> > +	struct device_node *layers_node __free(device_node) =
>> > +		of_get_child_by_name(of_node, "layers");
>>
>> We usualy don't declare variable in the middle of a function.
>> You should rather simply change the declaration line at the top like this:
>> struct device_node *layers_node __free(device_node) = NULL;
>
> It seems Linus disagree on this topic and I understand his arguments:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=whPZoi03ZwphxiW6cuWPtC3nyKYS8_BThgztCdgPWP1WA@mail.gmail.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wiCOTW5UftUrAnvJkr6769D29tF7Of79gUjdQHS_TkF5A@mail.gmail.com/

I agree it makes code much more readable, espacially in the case of cleanup
actions.

> Then, ok to me:
> Reviewed-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>

Thanks! I'm applying this patch to drm-misc-fixes perhaps next week.

Luca

--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-03 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-29 16:21 Felix Gu
2026-01-29 22:01 ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-02-03  9:57 ` Kory Maincent
2026-02-03 13:35   ` Kory Maincent
2026-02-03 17:51     ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2026-02-10 16:44 ` Luca Ceresoli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DG5INIQWWPJV.31PV8URRWUZF6@bootlin.com \
    --to=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
    --cc=paulk@sys-base.io \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=ustc.gu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome