From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.maslowski.xyz (mail.maslowski.xyz [45.77.158.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3956936D510; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 16:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.77.158.94 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771344010; cv=none; b=B8pQYLo4XjU/a8RjH7jx3np2L3Y959q2GThc96fZxVej8ceZ77+NvVMquFH9bH0vvcvcEBgToD4WCPqtZE7Qr4dL2/Sq+EkiBisFYhmKpKYz0IWDGBuJk0N3+2+h6WUh2f8pqJ74lhWOxqWCqK2PGBNTdOmin4rfUbIiXK0HM9M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771344010; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q1BmHhviC6N1jXGhvikFmFlJCnnggZpy+erfgrbZ65s=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From:To:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=Xtpv9m/RIB+K1gKOmc847Qz5fkUwiyZqQ1aj45YgpKMts8B5PgZV2qqK0BAXw3WwCIQqBUif+j6OrtjEHCUenkXO5fe0DGtpiLdo4i6s3jtS8jk75xCJ0o/0fHLQACLHG8iOG1L1FOC30oUJcEnbwJITl4cjQvZ+YKhUBGPWYD0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=maslowski.xyz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=maslowski.xyz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=maslowski.xyz header.i=@maslowski.xyz header.b=Cd7Jqhiq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.77.158.94 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=maslowski.xyz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=maslowski.xyz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=maslowski.xyz header.i=@maslowski.xyz header.b="Cd7Jqhiq" Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a00:f41:3430:d49a:a81b:6380:9404:ab0b]) by mail.maslowski.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB78C7D59F; Tue, 17 Feb 2026 15:51:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=maslowski.xyz; s=mail; t=1771343518; bh=q1BmHhviC6N1jXGhvikFmFlJCnnggZpy+erfgrbZ65s=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Cd7JqhiqpKq+Sge5NdLTGtBZxPvJONgnCEQFvBs/aYcpqFC1AmgKpywSDY6tMigdp DvL2W9L2oiLunM06DOGu39raIDhqhxCMB86UwYXnxsL26KsCXi7s1NBrTWGnZdw/+f BVDi5WODWY68Rs4Wtz2ho7l/EmDQ0v1SUvyPLZnp6VB6IUjiCDkOYxpcYk33ZCWdMH OGywc2an5LMZKUKeB2NYptdWNHlFUaRgYK33to9VDHgPzIvvaQNWgDRJDTCeyPwL5b 21GkZqgQ5Tqw6N1kdTChp+YCKTXX8NnVohuNvY6qvKyWZcH7qq63HAo7BAo9S/Dbo6 Uhja00DGffiKw== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 16:51:54 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: soc: Add SPDX ids to many soc files From: =?utf-8?q?Piotr_Mas=C5=82owski?= To: "Tim Bird" Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2 References: <20260214004314.3787727-1-tim.bird@sony.com> In-Reply-To: <20260214004314.3787727-1-tim.bird@sony.com> Hello! On Sat Feb 14, 2026 at 1:43 AM CET, Tim Bird wrote: > Add appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier lines to the > the remaining files that are missing such lines in the > sound/soc directory, and in a few other miscelaneous files. > Remove boilerplate license text. > [...] > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only [...] > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 Is there some intended meaning behind this distinction? Bear in mind I'm not a kernel developer so I might very well be missing something, but AFAIK the `GPL-2.0` SPDX identifier is just an older, deprecated variant with the same meaning as `GPL-2.0-only`. (Just like `GPL-2.0+` which is a deprecated version of `GPL-2.0-or-later`.) Anyway, this patch looks like a nice improvement. [...] Best regards, Piotr Mas=C5=82owski