From: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
To: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: "Janne Grunau" <j@jannau.net>, <asahi@lists.linux.dev>,
<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: pin-init: internal: init: remove `#[disable_initialized_field_access]`
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 14:09:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DGSCTOQYK8QH.2JT8CMI448WRR@garyguo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260302140424.4097655-1-lossin@kernel.org>
On Mon Mar 2, 2026 at 2:04 PM GMT, Benno Lossin wrote:
> Gary noticed [1] that the initializer macros as well as the `[Pin]Init`
> traits cannot support unaligned fields, since they use operations that
> require aligned pointers. This means that any code using structs with
> unaligned fields in pin-init is unsound.
>
> By default, the `init!` macro generates references to initialized
> fields, which makes the compiler check that those fields are aligned.
> However, we added the `#[disable_initialized_field_access]` attribute to
> avoid this behavior in ceca298c53f9 ("rust: pin-init: internal: init:
> add escape hatch for referencing initialized fields"). Thus remove the
> `#[disable_initialized_field_access]` attribute from `init!`, which is
> the only safe way to create an initializer handling unaligned fields.
>
> If support for in-place initializing structs with unaligned fields is
> required in the future, we could figure out a solution. This is tracked
> in [2].
>
> Reported-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
> Link: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/561532-pin-init/topic/initialized.20field.20accessor.20detection/with/576210658 [1]
> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/issues/112 [2]
> Fixes: ceca298c53f9 ("rust: pin-init: internal: init: add escape hatch for referencing initialized fields")
> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
> ---
> Changelog:
> * changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260228113713.1402110-1-lossin@kernel.org
> - improved note added to the code in patch 2
> - improved commit messages
> ---
> This commit does not need backporting, as ceca298c53f9 is not yet in any
> stable tree.
>
> However, the unsoundness still affects two stable trees, because it was
> unknowingly fixed in commit 42415d163e5d ("rust: pin-init: add
> references to previously initialized fields"). Before then, packed
> structs compiled without any issues with pin-init and thus all prior
> kernel versions with pin-init that do not contain that commit are
> affected.
>
> We introduced pin-init in 90e53c5e70a6 ("rust: add pin-init API core"),
> which was included in 6.4. The affected stable trees that are still
> maintained are: 6.12 and 6.6. Note that 6.18 and 6.19 already contain
> 42415d163e5d, so they are unaffected.
>
> I will prepare a separate patch series to backport 42415d163e5d to each
> of the affected trees, including the second patch of this series that
> documents the fact that field accessors are load-bearing for soundness.
>
> Janne Grunau has worked around [3] this problem in the AOP audio driver
> downstream, which was the reason for adding the
> `#[disable_initialized_field_access]` attribute in the first place.
>
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260301171222.GA22561@robin.jannau.net
> ---
> rust/pin-init/internal/src/init.rs | 39 ++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 14:04 Benno Lossin
2026-03-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rust: pin-init: internal: init: document load-bearing fact of field accessors Benno Lossin
2026-03-02 14:14 ` Gary Guo
2026-03-02 14:20 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-03-02 14:48 ` Benno Lossin
2026-03-02 14:09 ` Gary Guo [this message]
2026-03-02 20:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: pin-init: internal: init: remove `#[disable_initialized_field_access]` Janne Grunau
2026-03-03 11:31 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-03-04 6:59 ` Benno Lossin
2026-03-04 7:06 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-03-04 12:26 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-03-05 8:05 ` Benno Lossin
2026-03-06 10:07 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DGSCTOQYK8QH.2JT8CMI448WRR@garyguo.net \
--to=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=j@jannau.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®