From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-02.galae.net (smtpout-02.galae.net [185.246.84.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3AAD415F03 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786970084; cv=none; b=aFxDAEgC5IJ+tdsdTbyjPXpzLNGRJ2OfosaGZD+vMTT7XUYJe6irP8piDA4wJ9f6rq1rgmbikNcBoT93u5pSqNxCENCMTSsqGE3TBN4xUmP8yF5oPLf60UrbmNyHdYwQI6IhVPrJtl5t+cudNIACYVqHatVpzshD5Xs8qoKzez8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786970084; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t9jWyBdZdQwH82cE3h61208mFIq6dRzArIgnVLSJ74c=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=dlEkWtf2CElExm/DBl1Epua6oGLgY9wGGvyo6HxJbKEhU0Sa3xCbSQmoKjpDyiJFe7RsFdzhiVBYfcCkKMuDjvxqigHtHQq667h1elAMQcgd5sqjRlPYpCr4davR3eLOSWUxe7PRdfqGlJRO1Fwa2YtEQnBBGDz1OO/2jrSsJ0g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=cPzOPisL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="cPzOPisL" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-02.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23101A16D0; Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1EB60352; Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 800DE11C7242C; Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:34:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1786970074; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=t9jWyBdZdQwH82cE3h61208mFIq6dRzArIgnVLSJ74c=; b=cPzOPisLUuJiMMnHBWQ9zlXt5Hv8XNmuxnMeBNrFTwt+B5uhIswDTvmk+kyiHq30LUotLc gYxdwDOAkz5PZIN04PyMdHePxaFQ8Gq7XE9gZ/fgsQBD9i4gCqMm9e1C/Goj9ufsuVDdOo dYIXmWueCBUEDY55r0Rn80xsa9UpRajDX/a0vT2vBwp7wH88O4iBWbixJbiyQGCqV7+dB5 K+QszE5kSju0gC2N015gO2hMVwOLYpq4No9F0yFKchikUXo4dtbVHWjrady16iWs+cX/3d Pj+CnqETtb8N56G52CSp56BOG1q/IAL7yjnI3B5dd2jAKuNP+tL6sLJfp7vb9g== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:34:30 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] drm/mcde: dsi: simplify device_node management using scoped for_each variant Cc: "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , "Andrzej Hajda" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Robert Foss" , "Laurent Pinchart" , "Jonas Karlman" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Jessica Zhang" , "Inki Dae" , "Jagan Teki" , "Marek Szyprowski" , "Dmitry Baryshkov" , "Hui Pu" , "Ian Ray" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , , To: "Linus Walleij" , "Luca Ceresoli" From: "Luca Ceresoli" X-Mailer: aerc 0.22.0 References: <20260814-drm-bridge-every-panel-v1-0-19cd5277cc8d@bootlin.com> <20260814-drm-bridge-every-panel-v1-8-19cd5277cc8d@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hello Linus, On Mon Aug 17, 2026 at 2:25 PM CEST, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 4:07=E2=80=AFPM Luca Ceresoli wrote: > >> Before further modifying this function, simpify the struct device_node >> management using the scoped variat of for_each_available_child_of_node()= . >> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli > > This looks like it can be queued already irrespective of other > patches, Absolutely. That's not the case for patch 9, which works only if patch 5 (or a better future version of it) is applied. So I'm all OK if you want to apply this patch. > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Thanks! Luca -- Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com