From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D52C1380FEB for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 09:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788429224; cv=none; b=L0ufoAdFXcHKDAAgI9d148gYwCHJ4WLBkVccTZXfhwpzqzqYUICHiZ3g5jDUUZRlX67zY9THIU9/XxOydMG7EFIzDgccIPi9j9FSpjMEZ5HFVKO+T5ZN+LB3mHSVJ3QDUIbQKAAtIqne7oi4gJQMnvuBr0oW5ypuFSahUK7oVWM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788429224; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d4y5Hn0EBhF1grLy92/G1W/mcg/unwEoTt2qMQQaKU0=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:Subject:Cc:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=FqtpopWm8+jOKQCK3+fu5XsID2A8jq50CzTagE+VpAbGFSozXuccdt0SvSq1DbrUH3nYymkeAFnuyksIBspo/F9R+oHBjhAWaXV6nGUcf1MH5cQNZKyyGKW1cGRywXmPDhNcYUyszf+GEqw2hU69KgpFK4co2EpZAEBwwA8LgkY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Wl2HdFNv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Wl2HdFNv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BDED1F000E9; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 09:53:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788429222; bh=d4y5Hn0EBhF1grLy92/G1W/mcg/unwEoTt2qMQQaKU0=; h=Date:From:Subject:Cc:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=Wl2HdFNv9ck/rElbAHmVFE7nflBnSrTW/tfAbnLXNxct+5s8QoGWdWEuLrtkVAgIH aubllsRn5anEp99KO2S53jDaNAV4Sdkxg2EHuyNG10qKEogM0O8B/ZDQ94VRWGkCc9 kRPfwxJNU5iNQhCdr3ol7l6l/XBXOMBdfX9gQptSmoTJSBKUnndiJv6MHhOMVnt04h BKBtHga7MjLjXl3WK2L1l9HmTwPY4i9sP7BiZvkt+7TuJrR1bnda03AwXPkX9A+NXN 9T6KF4eleru0QB7elLk23qFg4IGxhsf9BJuqqVJV6gJ/yfayZNfGg6BIX5/+aH3/Z4 6SAks6FXSpRaQ== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 11:53:38 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Danilo Krummrich" Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm/sched: Create faux device for KUnit tests Cc: , "Matthew Brost" , "Philipp Stanner" , =?utf-8?q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , , , "Shixiong Ou" To: "Maxime Ripard" References: <20260903090256.552317-1-oushixiong1025@163.com> In-Reply-To: On Thu Sep 3, 2026 at 11:36 AM CEST, Maxime Ripard wrote: > What's wrong with drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(), or kunit_device_regist= er()? That's probably may bad, in a previous patch that tried to support a NULL d= evice in the scheduler instead I mistakenly mentioned faux while making the point= that we should use some mock device instead. Thanks, Danilo