From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-179.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F3CA3839A0 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.179 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789108871; cv=none; b=JvTQCKC6KlkoSePSPdGEvUiNCn1xTB2ejf7R+eXsyhhNAgjphR+axF4vvu8ndcDTuswRa3PoHQJzw8ECOaiwIqZIQzIO0Ucr3TbQhKzIOocJiuhl1nebZAnX83asIztyvP+tg2MXhM+lsoToX29267pR5qu4qSrOKQ2yfWP/GSI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789108871; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ExOsGl2j4nMlAou7DL7hm0Ih5Hfn8Z4OdLD7D7iXx/g=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=IuCKRQg2oBwCeu8e9MSrRBS5+BwHsV2tCEliSOuC8cHyOP0NyImZoq3na/h8/kRD+UXper8MOIQuBHoSPjCc4j830Qmsk69N3OhgCEGV5c3uKBjSDAoFANZXUde7tboFJxp/EWtB19C2EqGNaBEAQbG2a0lChH9MXwo7jSLbvKw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=hzhX8wi7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="hzhX8wi7" X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=ExOsGl2j4nMlAou7DL7hm0Ih5Hfn8Z4OdLD7D7iXx/g=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1789108861; v=1; x=1789713661; b=hzhX8wi7czmdIH7/JaMa0S5TzkjJZY4gwY5uSktT5YYpndJu/sAex8VltPsbJJEScxnhfb1s YYWI4tYYhwgBYSpEHc5rlTR6bSXK1fp5U+Vsqd97r7vAgjogL1L132R6tcMlt5LJjPboyLhUqH3 oUCRrRFw84/0NRfPsU84sVwA= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id c00feb8a6972bf63; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 06:41:01 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: c00feb8a6972bf63 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:41:00 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael Straube" , "Peter Robinson" , "Bitterblue Smith" Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/7] wifi: rtw88: sdio: zero the padding added to a TX transfer From: "Luka Gejak" To: "Ping-Ke Shih" , "Luka Gejak" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2 References: <20260909074556.55709-1-luka.gejak@linux.dev> <20260909074556.55709-5-luka.gejak@linux.dev> In-Reply-To: On Fri Sep 11, 2026 at 2:30 AM CEST, Ping-Ke Shih wrote: > Luka Gejak >>=20 >> One thing to decide, though. The commit message says the padding "costs >> nothing observable", which is too strong given the numbers in that same >> paragraph. Do you think it needs rewording? If so, would you be willing >> to amend it yourself when applying? That seems better than a resend of >> seven patches for one line. > > I can amend it myself as > > "... padding the transfer costs about 2% observable over transfer." > > Or you can help to reword the paragraph. I can copy & paste it. > > Ping-Ke Please amend it yourself, that is much better than a resend. Here is the change: =20 "padding the transfer costs nothing observable:" to "padding the transfer= =20 costs about 2% observable over transfer:" Leave the rest as is, after semicolons there are numbers to explain that 2%= . Best regards, Luka Gejak