From: "Diederik de Haas" <diederik@cknow-tech.com>
To: "Diederik de Haas" <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ricardo Pardini" <ricardo@pardini.net>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix i2c6 clock-frequency on NanoPC-T6
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 17:48:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLDGFSSZUIKQ.19CS0SRKYOKOJ@cknow-tech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DLDEGZ68QQ19.1MJEB7QOK4G7T@cknow-tech.com>
On Sat Sep 12, 2026 at 4:16 PM CEST, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Sat Sep 12, 2026 at 2:41 PM CEST, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 11. September 2026, 17:28:33 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Diederik de Haas:
>>> The i2c6 bus needs to run at 200kHz, because at the default frequency of
>>> 100kHz it may fail to find the RTC resulting in warnings/errors like
>>>
>>> rtc-hym8563 6-0051: no valid clock/calendar values available
>>> rtc-hym8563 6-0051: hctosys: unable to read the hardware clock
>>>
>>> But only sometimes. This should not happen when there is a battery backing
>>> the RTC, yet it does ... sometimes.
>>
>> I'm confused, shouldn't a slower clock always work?
>> Like I understand how a clock that is too fast can cause issues due
>> to hardware limitations, but running the bus slower somehow shouldn't
>> cause issues?
>
> Impeccable timing ... as I was just about to retract this patch.
>
> So please ignore/drop this and sorry for the noise.
https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/commit/815c9a084e62d700ab5487974b63035e772a29a4
"remove the buf[0] & HYM8563_SEC_VL, it's unsuitable for some hym8563.
set rtc init time for first power on."
I guess I have 'some hym8563' in both my NanoPC-T6 LTS & Plus :-/
The one in my NanoPi R5S works great, so I'll just use/depend on that one.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-12 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 15:28 Diederik de Haas
2026-09-12 12:41 ` Heiko Stuebner
2026-09-12 14:16 ` Diederik de Haas
2026-09-12 15:48 ` Diederik de Haas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DLDGFSSZUIKQ.19CS0SRKYOKOJ@cknow-tech.com \
--to=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ricardo@pardini.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®