From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from arkamax.eu (128-116-240-228.dyn.eolo.it [128.116.240.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFE848988A for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 15:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=128.116.240.228 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789399562; cv=none; b=hrFUvVVPwpQPo55kcTYMiZK3tSZ9jtZLU0u1Dqt3b7/UMU/zdtJbF83n7wCWLFFPFZrN/lLvAJza/yiw4IoD3E/YrbBtAW4yz2YG7KjYGLiJCk0hxj3vgbDiwookKoNN8rc/0+3u7bpwPyI/lplITplv6wjE8bBH3fsg3giUpzc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789399562; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LLVhb726Wd6VctkKYcfyvFb50durPjk31wXuFNm8ji4=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:To:Cc:Subject:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=uuBwEaC3QzW/2QcMril+I6APQBbU0Fxdq4JIKWKpkKxRUdbzJIUfcDxOlUwQbKHAOGS98qfb0BUUtdvPV1TxzHBGGnWUraokYL6ub1FH3VV3gDo9sph2J2x/fmNNP7EGcuRInZxTedZnkmVYLa0AQxw+EO+SKnKXnuoYF6v+0BM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=arkamax.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arkamax.eu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arkamax.eu header.i=@arkamax.eu header.b=FDLkArDk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=128.116.240.228 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=arkamax.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arkamax.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arkamax.eu header.i=@arkamax.eu header.b="FDLkArDk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=mail1; bh=LLVhb726Wd6Vct kKYcfyvFb50durPjk31wXuFNm8ji4=; h=in-reply-to:references:from:subject: cc:to:date; d=arkamax.eu; b=FDLkArDkHUwCtOM/m7r3cFF7UhZKwVUsF4n+bOpX+0 qG2yMKlc7cID72h3LvC0Mb6EjYfc5uN4kQQfZMVMjdTG1hYLaJjjEoLpZvugyTUGTFMHXz Xs51WHTLa3q7mXzy5zrAEFAmKixNPwh/PAKCT6dasn5Sr8sSuv3BuqTGdizgGm0mW9SUWm XhcoMGqoGybMtueU63tatps/agcz2ROypwGc+uY8I828LFRohFNABkUBcAiQMtd5cgVujT dVEBSQS+6/mljzeXDW4TkVDqQvkKaspj7YcRfitH8sqrr4ThSczXGT0KkrbyVP0FAr6Byb LND6dzYTXmjuftVpmTzQ== Received: from localhost (128-116-240-228.dyn.eolo.it [128.116.240.228]) by arkamax.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 3fef3a6a (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 14 Sep 2026 17:25:57 +0200 (CEST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 17:25:57 +0200 Message-Id: To: "Keith Busch" , "Maurizio Lombardi" Cc: "syzbot" , , , , , , Subject: Re: [syzbot] [nvme?] WARNING in nvme_loop_reset_ctrl_work From: "Maurizio Lombardi" X-Mailer: aerc 0.22.0 References: <6a9ed559.6e6c5f9e.240462.0003.GAE@google.com> <6aa6c282.4c28b7d0.c1bba.000d.GAE@google.com> In-Reply-To: On Mon Sep 14, 2026 at 5:20 PM CEST, Keith Busch wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 12:16:53PM +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote: >> Maybe moving the controller to CONNECTING state before exposing it to >> sysfs will prevent the warning: > > I think all the transports set CONNECTING after adding the controller, > so this would have to be duplicated for all of them, right? But why do > we allow going from NEW to RESETTING? I don't think any of the > transports do that anymore, so we can remove that transition instead. Yeah, this is indeed what I was preparing to submit. The diff I sent earlier today was just a bad idea. Maurizio