From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46A6F395AD1; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789477305; cv=none; b=SDHO+u1wR/urk8TgXT69+/y0WAMYXw5GlmkNqZ9gM8AZDVCAnfr1vdqY7h6o+o7N/bbOZEiEa2Gu+7OoYU8ycUzNNAcgkZ6zhBZEfjLZV6c6dr4sGjTjgUL8rvgKhcRotPDRlnClGmbdwc1XFYtq7MjPd+ADZ0hP55KY3JWfisQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789477305; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Gm/3e9UjKl5QyiWjyjBfCYBN5w2b9wu+1Jhq9Oqdu/E=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=jlAdZBR13icsOzFGl/6OR6RKT9iiSDHewJ82JsNKFpYDo/g5JHf6D74uuTC+3RWv593tjeMu8uNVrbibdF+waSnAkoaXBSkJFIzzU8D2aYvkKY6CgGMVG6KAvdpGfxxD89UWF/9Ui5ZPR9g1GjW224HnTGxtesD/d3odQgZTgPY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=1xhRbVli; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="1xhRbVli" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2AA6C5CD4F; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ECB860498; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id B79B311C7AFE9; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:01:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1789477291; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=Gm/3e9UjKl5QyiWjyjBfCYBN5w2b9wu+1Jhq9Oqdu/E=; b=1xhRbVli6u57wYGElEqFmqQA0BT75q9nwKXJCrIHMRefXtLuM9lOUVccY188+rjNpRfhHd Vc9tGeaAi8/hKFaOi7OCdVSpD9rTEEYTd1LFtv7BoRUEt+910XZrWB3WJa0+Xnv4YP4k0N HujSkX7BU2dckCG0utovqqYwKxIyFEyvJt1z8mwUhJA5C6DFY57dBdf4MFhEsXn0sBWB1U 2bXaL0ilZSKUiAvJXs3BEXGGZ2nmSXntB9I6QmjghE9hoNVzDdLzpoMueAw7EJlNO3xo5J +ojV/u26omB1EEjBFYroMJxpxRiYaWDahR+gaPyFxTc2T5YMHk4TKU6eqUhZvQ== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:01:14 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 2/2] drm/bridge: Add Lontium LT9611C(EX/UXD) MIPI DSI to HDMI driver Cc: , , , "Dmitry Baryshkov" To: , "Sunyun Yang" , "Andrzej Hajda" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Robert Foss" , "Laurent Pinchart" , "Jonas Karlman" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Luca Ceresoli" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , "Vinod Koul" From: "Luca Ceresoli" X-Mailer: aerc 0.22.0 References: <20260915-lt9611c-v7-v15-0-88f9e9387eab@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260915-lt9611c-v7-v15-2-88f9e9387eab@oss.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <20260915-lt9611c-v7-v15-2-88f9e9387eab@oss.qualcomm.com> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hello Mohit, On Tue Sep 15, 2026 at 2:33 PM CEST, mohit.dsor wrote: > From: Sunyun Yang > > LT9611C(EX/UXD) is an I2C-controlled chip that Receiver signal/dual port > mipi dsi and output hdmi, differences in hardware features: > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov You are carrying this Reviewed-by Dmitry since v11, but the patch has changed a lot since then. You should drop that R-by line, unless you got an explicit consent to keeping it for specific agreed changes. Luca -- Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com