From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Weiming Shi" <bestswngs@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Peter Oskolkov" <posk@google.com>, "Xiang Mei" <xmei5@asu.edu>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] bpf: clear stale IPv4 options after LWT encapsulation
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 17:06:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLKB3T7PYCND.3FLS0I8UEX9NL@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920163211.795547-3-bestswngs@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 12:32 AM Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com> wrote:
> Select the reset layout from the protocol callback which consumes the
> packet: the original family for BPF_OK and unsupported redirects, or the
> new family for supported reroute and redirect paths. Preserve the ingress
> interface and L3-slave state from the restored original control block and
> initialize the IPv6 next-header offset when needed. Save and restore the
> marker around nested LWT runs.
What Daniel sketched in v2 was 20 lines. This is still an overkill.
[...]
> +static void bpf_lwt_reset_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, __be16 orig_proto,
> + bool use_new_proto)
> +{
> + __be16 cb_proto = use_new_proto ? skb->protocol : orig_proto;
> + int iif = skb->skb_iif;
> + bool l3slave = false;
> +
> + /* VRF may have replaced skb_iif with the master device index. */
> + if (orig_proto == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
> + iif = IPCB(skb)->iif;
> + l3slave = ipv4_l3mdev_skb(IPCB(skb)->flags);
When the family doesn't change only IPCB(skb)->opt is stale.
Clear just that like ip_tunnel_xmit() and udp_tunnel_xmit_skb() do.
iif and flags stay as they are and the VRF special casing goes away.
When the family changes do what seg6_do_srh_encap() does.
[...]
> + use_new_proto = (ret == BPF_LWT_REROUTE &&
> + lwt->prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT) ||
> + (ret == BPF_REDIRECT && can_redirect);
> + if (lwt_ip_encap)
> + bpf_lwt_reset_cb(skb, orig_proto, use_new_proto);
Not needed. BPF_OK after the prog changed the family is broken no
matter which layout the cb has. bpf_xmit() drops such skb and
bpf_input() hands a v6 packet to ip_forward().
Use skb->protocol.
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 16:32 [PATCH v3 0/3] " Weiming Shi
2026-09-20 16:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] bpf: propagate cb_access from freplace programs Weiming Shi
2026-09-20 17:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-20 17:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-09-20 16:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] bpf: clear stale IPv4 options after LWT encapsulation Weiming Shi
2026-09-20 17:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-09-20 16:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: cover stale CB after LWT IP encapsulation Weiming Shi
2026-09-20 17:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DLKB3T7PYCND.3FLS0I8UEX9NL@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=posk@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®