From: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
To: "Zijin Tao" <taozj888@163.com>, <maintainer@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
<andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: macb: rate limit netdev error info print in the data path
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:58:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLKVCOXTNGVZ.3CC6KFXDIFJ3X@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920095839.62852-1-taozj888@163.com>
Hello Zijin,
You sent the same patch 3 times?
Message-ID: <20260920095839.62852-1-taozj888@163.com>
Message-ID: <20260920100658.65087-1-taozj888@163.com>
Message-ID: <20260920100920.65773-1-taozj888@163.com>
Also you are missing the prefix [PATCH net] or [PATCH net-next].
Read up about this here (and read the full page):
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
On Sun Sep 20, 2026 at 11:58 AM CEST, Zijin Tao wrote:
> Now the MACB ethernet driver print the netdev error information
> directly by netdev_err(), which would lead to a large number of
> error information print if there was a significant number of
> error or just jumbo packets received when booting.
> For example, it would print a large number of:
>
> macb PHYT0036:00 eth0: not whole frame pointed by descriptor
> macb PHYT0036:00 eth0: not whole frame pointed by descriptor
> ...
This whole patch is LLM generated? I don't think this "PHYT0036:00"
device name could ever exist. Please don't hallucinate kernel logs.
In both cases, I prefer the commit message to either indicate whether it
is a theoretical bugfix or a bug hit in practice. I know I've faced
such a log spam on MACB in the past, but I don't remember which log
line it was.
> in gem_rx() by received a large number of packets without
> RX_SOF or RX_EOF flag set.
>
> The unlimited print here would greatly bother and delay
> the system booting process unless the source stop sending
> packets.
I don't understand the relation to the booting process here.
> So rate limit the netdev error information print in the receive
> and transmit data path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zijin Tao <taozj888@163.com>
Thanks Zijin,
--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 9:58 Zijin Tao
2026-09-21 8:58 ` Théo Lebrun [this message]
2026-09-21 9:01 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-09-21 10:01 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-20 10:06 Zijin Tao
2026-09-20 10:09 Zijin Tao
2026-09-24 1:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-24 9:02 ` Théo Lebrun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DLKVCOXTNGVZ.3CC6KFXDIFJ3X@bootlin.com \
--to=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maintainer@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=taozj888@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®