mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>
Cc: <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	<bhelgaas@google.com>, <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	<ojeda@kernel.org>, <boqun@kernel.org>, <gary@garyguo.net>,
	<bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, <lossin@kernel.org>,
	<a.hindborg@kernel.org>, <tmgross@umich.edu>,
	<markus.probst@posteo.de>, <cjia@nvidia.com>, <smitra@nvidia.com>,
	<ankita@nvidia.com>, <aniketa@nvidia.com>, <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	<targupta@nvidia.com>, <kjaju@nvidia.com>, <alkumar@nvidia.com>,
	<acourbot@nvidia.com>, <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	<zhiwang@kernel.org>, <jgg@nvidia.com>, <alex@shazbot.org>,
	"Peter Colberg" <pcolberg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] rust: pci: add {enable,disable}_sriov(), to control SR-IOV capability
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 18:37:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLQ8UW9ONGHB.NBCSFW530R38@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924190556.1620886-2-zhiw@nvidia.com>

On Thu Sep 24, 2026 at 9:05 PM CEST, Zhi Wang wrote:
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/pci.rs b/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> index 3ec897709e89..e6dac919f02d 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> @@ -133,6 +133,10 @@ extern "C" fn remove_callback(pdev: *mut bindings::pci_dev) {
>          // INVARIANT: `pdev` is valid for the duration of `remove_callback()`.
>          let pdev = unsafe { &*pdev.cast::<Device<device::CoreInternal<'_>>>() };
>  
> +        // Keep PF data installed until all VF remove callbacks have completed.
> +        #[cfg(CONFIG_PCI_IOV)]
> +        pdev.disable_sriov();

I don't think we need this? The VfRegistration should guard against this
already.

> +
>          // SAFETY: `remove_callback` is only ever called after a successful call to
>          // `probe_callback`, hence it's guaranteed that `Device::set_drvdata()` has been called
>          // and stored a `Pin<KBox<T::Data<'_>>>`.
> @@ -472,6 +476,38 @@ pub fn set_master(&self) {
>          // SAFETY: `self.as_raw` is guaranteed to be a pointer to a valid `struct pci_dev`.
>          unsafe { bindings::pci_set_master(self.as_raw()) };
>      }
> +
> +    /// Enable the Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV) capability for this device,
> +    /// where `nr_virtfn` is number of Virtual Functions (VF) to enable.
> +    #[cfg(CONFIG_PCI_IOV)]
> +    pub fn enable_sriov(&self, nr_virtfn: i32) -> Result {
> +        // SAFETY:
> +        // `self.as_raw` returns a valid pointer to a `struct pci_dev`.
> +        //
> +        // `pci_enable_sriov()` checks that the enable operation is valid:
> +        // - the device is a Physical Function (PF),
> +        // - SR-IOV is currently disabled, and
> +        // - `nr_virtfn` does not exceed the total number of supported VFs.
> +        //
> +        // The Core device context inherits from the Bound device context,
> +        // which guarantees that the PF device is bound to a driver.
> +        to_result(unsafe { bindings::pci_enable_sriov(self.as_raw(), nr_virtfn) })
> +    }
> +
> +    /// Disable the Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV) capability for this device.
> +    #[cfg(CONFIG_PCI_IOV)]
> +    pub fn disable_sriov(&self) {
> +        // SAFETY:
> +        // `self.as_raw` returns a valid pointer to a `struct pci_dev`.
> +        //
> +        // `pci_disable_sriov()` checks that the disable operation is valid:
> +        // - the device is a Physical Function (PF), and
> +        // - SR-IOV is currently enabled.
> +        //
> +        // The Core device context inherits from the Bound device context,
> +        // which guarantees that the PF device is bound to a driver.
> +        unsafe { bindings::pci_disable_sriov(self.as_raw()) };
> +    }
>  }

I think we do not need to expose those as functions on Device<Core>. We should
only need to call those from the sriov_configure() callback and should otherwise
be covered by the VfRegistration.

Hence, I suggest to expose those methods via a token type, which also helps to
use an RAII patterns for cleanup rather than manual enable/disable calls:

Instead of a single sriov_configure() callback that covers both cases, we can
have two callbacks.

	fn sriov_enable<'bound>(
	    dev: &'bound Device<device::Core<'_>>,
	    data: Pin<&'bound Self::Data<'bound>>,
	    token: SriovEnable<'_>,
	) -> Result<SriovEnabled<'_>>;

and

	fn sriov_disable<'bound>(
	    dev: &'a Device<device::Core<'_>>,
	    data: Pin<&'bound Self::Data<'bound>>,
	    token: SriovDisable<'_>,
	) -> Result;

Note the return type on sriov_enable(), which is obtained from token.enable().
It can serve as guard and automatically disable again of sriov_enable() fails
subsequently and returns an error. If it successfully returns SriovEnabled, the
PCI core can just discard it. The structs could look like this:

	pub struct SriovEnable<'a> {
	    dev: &'a Device<device::CoreInternal<'a>>,
	    num_vfs: u32,
	}
	
	impl<'a> SriovEnable<'a> {
	    pub fn num_vfs(&self) -> u32 {
	        self.num_vfs
	    }
	
	    pub fn enable(self, num_vfs: u32) -> Result<SriovEnabled<'a>> {
	        let ret = unsafe {
	            bindings::pci_enable_sriov(self.dev.as_raw(), num_vfs)
	        };
	        to_result(ret)?;
	
	        Ok(SriovEnabled { dev: self.dev, num_vfs })
	    }
	}

And the destructor of SriovEnabled could be:

	impl Drop for SriovEnabled<'_> {
	    fn drop(&mut self) {
	        unsafe { bindings::pci_disable_sriov(self.dev.as_raw()) }
	    }
	}

We could still have the helpers on Device<CoreInternal> so you can use them
safely in the guard types.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-27 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 19:05 [PATCH v2 0/8] Add Rust PCI SR-IOV support Zhi Wang
2026-09-24 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] rust: pci: add {enable,disable}_sriov(), to control SR-IOV capability Zhi Wang
2026-09-25 20:43   ` Peter Colberg
2026-09-28 19:32     ` Zhi Wang
2026-09-27 16:37   ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-09-28 19:45     ` Zhi Wang
2026-09-24 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] rust: pci: add vtable attribute to pci::Driver trait Zhi Wang
2026-09-24 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] rust: pci: add is_virtfn(), to check for VFs Zhi Wang
2026-09-24 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] rust: pci: add is_physfn(), to check for PFs Zhi Wang
2026-09-24 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] rust: pci: add num_vf(), to return number of VFs Zhi Wang
2026-09-24 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] rust: pci: add bus callback sriov_configure(), to control SR-IOV from sysfs Zhi Wang
2026-09-24 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] rust: pci: add typed SR-IOV PF registration data Zhi Wang
2026-09-28 20:08   ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-09-29  7:27     ` Zhi Wang
2026-09-29  8:35       ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-09-24 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] samples: rust: add Rust SR-IOV VF driver sample Zhi Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DLQ8UW9ONGHB.NBCSFW530R38@kernel.org \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=alkumar@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=markus.probst@posteo.de \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=pcolberg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=smitra@nvidia.com \
    --cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhiwang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®