mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: "Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
Cc: "John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>, "Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
	<nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel" <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: validate checksum earlier on receive
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 15:24:33 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLQQGFT90VEK.3AMVLNNRWJEXU@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DLQNXKFGJHZ1.SGPZQQPQ6BT9@nvidia.com>

On Mon Sep 28, 2026 at 1:25 PM JST, Eliot Courtney wrote:
> On Sun Sep 27, 2026 at 10:46 PM JST, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> The checksum validation error message of `wait_for_msg` prints the
>> message's sequence number before validating the checksum.
>>
>> But the checksum is part of the transport layer, and it not validating
>> indicates a corruption that could very well be in the RPC message
>> header, meaning the value of this field cannot be trusted.
>>
>> Furthermore, the transport layer is not supposed to know the kind of
>> message it transports, and it accessing the RPC header is a layering
>> violation.
>>
>> Thus, move the checksum validation before we start looking at the
>> message header, and drop that information from the error message.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>
> N.B. this means that checking the length of the message (which uses the
> payload length) almost always gets replaced with a bad checksum error.
> But since we can't distinguish between corrupted data and something
> wrong with the lengths, we can't do anything about it anyway so lgtm.
> It also means we don't know which message had the bad checksum, but
> again I think this fine too.

Thankfully r000 gets rid of the checksum (which indeed is not very
critical when messages are sent through shared memory...), so that part
will eventually disappear. I just wanted to get the layering right to
make the split in the next patches easier.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-27 13:46 [PATCH v2 0/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: prepare the command queue for r000 dual-message types Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: validate checksum earlier on receive Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-28  4:25   ` Eliot Courtney
2026-09-28  6:24     ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2026-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: introduce and use proper RpcMessageHeader type Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-28  4:43   ` Eliot Courtney
2026-09-28  6:22     ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: group the RPC-specific part of send_single_command Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-28  4:52   ` Eliot Courtney
2026-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the send path Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-28  5:16   ` Eliot Courtney
2026-09-28  6:19     ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-28  6:40       ` Eliot Courtney
2026-09-28 11:35         ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: move the RPC send code into a sub-module Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the receive path Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-28  3:19   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: move the RPC receive code into a sub-module Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: move the RPC commands " Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-28  5:25   ` Eliot Courtney
2026-09-28  9:20   ` Zhi Wang
2026-09-28 11:40     ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-28 15:11       ` Zhi Wang
2026-09-27 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add `rpc` to RPC message send/receive methods Alexandre Courbot
2026-09-28  5:32   ` Eliot Courtney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DLQQGFT90VEK.3AMVLNNRWJEXU@nvidia.com \
    --to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®