From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD8621FF29; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790943664; cv=none; b=kDabLRBIlDNebIjJbnjjP3yLfrlu+j7mxRCT/y3vRhHBjJw/vr4mA5MIneF0L3Sieq3WJ492usQi4CyR4o9840/Cr4KRjrAyMxhFdNTF84C/m5feiaO5lD3q8RP2GfMgq4QrgIj5D3L0WtJAHLkPjSBn8wnTOdnS7gJdQVV5bVk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790943664; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RRwF+RWzV5dbJ42KBC/E1yIKgGPdDzKA7X5ZDTwZFyk=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=At0erArOseXYQpMlRKElb69dmiHH4vv8lEwhOGd2AK71zCecfs1q7NOAbA4xmY/RHtn58pTpXl1P2PMoYzG+6WhydapVg3GajqNRXWTxtfyCM2Qq53YTzJo63/o6e1ut6puXBnX3SLOTtmQciyGg/Qyx79GON9ywmb7LTHsXW+Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Sx4zunCZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Sx4zunCZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29CBA1F000FF; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:20:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790943662; bh=RRwF+RWzV5dbJ42KBC/E1yIKgGPdDzKA7X5ZDTwZFyk=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To; b=Sx4zunCZXnl/n9jJkLudFl8snLE8uZItOt9vsGG6odZrMf/NqzElurMWpf4ifNsvu QLRSdGfAQUNDjqXGutFpqSOxPzX/PxD2n3kAER88nb8zqxsa1RxBWoKNXF3kIHJ0+w 1u5QyJ255Acq32H/A8vtehC64nITwJ7WnBcLPIXqcyxo2UzMlg2n/HET8dWRgTF1yG cmGalWa2UGDycpWSmY/pGGEvJ/mkpREjMaWM13cMDjaGjmO8C3sP59q0meYem8mnpE W6GhJNKkli+4WXkL8O7uzISlmlO76t6ubj5JgcUIq3bmmRnENSFFhWoKtEh4TEZ86L KcnQMKhnGKsAQ== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:20:56 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/15] rust: sync: completion: add wait_for_completion_timeout() Cc: "Gary Guo" , "John Hubbard" , "Timur Tabi" , "Alistair Popple" , "Eliot Courtney" , "Zhi Wang" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , "Bjorn Helgaas" , "Miguel Ojeda" , "Alex Gaynor" , "Boqun Feng" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Benno Lossin" , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Trevor Gross" , , "LKML" , "Joel Fernandes" To: "Alexandre Courbot" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <20260930034148.590687-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20260930034148.590687-3-jhubbard@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: On Fri Oct 2, 2026 at 12:55 PM CEST, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > I will drop this patch and replace the code using this new method (which > is just an optional probe-time self-test) by a polling loop on an > atomic. That way we can wait for the helper method to be available and > revisit this with the proper type. Sounds good, let's do this.