From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-02.galae.net (smtpout-02.galae.net [185.246.84.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 438B64A092B; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 13:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791464418; cv=none; b=aJjhsrfTDSUE9GL3CrHL0jaXzDTT5/xNmti09tW5hD0T/4QAYKZpRUYB9zUNc8Go3ppg3GmhFzhx8WvMIWiYGM4Vc7qOM7rV0RP+pd3hQYXZCTb24ktnH4aHk/x9vJ/N/avGZcZZSp3M31+g8n20JCPxb/8isE0T1o+e6iP6t7s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791464418; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7mcO4IJ0qvNbPE87EW+lwG4kqnPNldps9fmnc96NRYc=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=ZlzMmAjcxHP4n41LSmcMLv8qbyCpyZ6R6GIQ5QsNU5YzFavNE3hWGm7FkBVtB7hlswOPRcx8hmc99+BQPrquU5kSupDZmIcn/ul5C5y3edEFQjOCw8K6IFnnok2NGdHdUqnR7r6oafWfZ2ysEeCMagnlhcRq2Q3OWs9+pWzarPI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=GD7jwf92; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="GD7jwf92" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-02.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D2A01A118F; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 13:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603D460341; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 13:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id E0E74103302B9; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 14:59:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1791464412; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=oSZG6dmnuIR+9apVNS7t5YXATSgltycCVix57s1onZY=; b=GD7jwf92tDHnef84bIJbxwWQsZ6qaiGak1sPQbw1PlsHrfs0uRaQ+38alGnxOFcY9O0im7 9nEA0xfhezl/zMRnR/Y6jVAOL31d4S8pGG+v08eY7oTmyz9bypmP4rGQF3LnbtNUSBiwbU gTrxCdGMpiMkZYNGAwKPrm/ww4R1J4bGeROmVNulcMQfIm+L/URrcMdiCDULdWGM47HX9u FAdXSF154TOUIrZxPRpcRi1E467DOZKmem900HKi3fgk+X5hIxT+b/w+OZokDjCYNI0nIr gv4PODjglaROZpmgyqtWQjh+5GdjYayeiD0U+oltWv11GPYTWJR2rAJvPdlCSA== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 14:59:55 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] net: macb: rate limit netdev error info print in the data path Cc: , "Conor Dooley" , "Andrew Lunn" , "David S. Miller" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Jakub Kicinski" , "Paolo Abeni" , "Jeff Garzik" , "Haavard Skinnemoen" , "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , "open list" To: "taozj888" From: =?utf-8?q?Th=C3=A9o_Lebrun?= X-Mailer: aerc 0.22.0-0-gc2f86b7abde3 References: <20261007053211.572073-1-taozj888@163.com> <63731290.3f0c.1a1198fe993.Coremail.taozj888@163.com> In-Reply-To: <63731290.3f0c.1a1198fe993.Coremail.taozj888@163.com> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hello Zijin, - I'll stop replying inline because you seem to be having issues with your mailer. Please fix it to ease the discussion. See here how your email looks: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/63731290.3f0c.1a1198fe993.Coremail.taozj8= 88@163.com/ - Your V4 commit message says "Fixes: 89e5785fc8a6" but that is wrong with the current patch, it shold use 4df95131ea80. I don't understand why you are talking about the changelog at the same time, this is unrelated. - You skipped over explaining why your dropped the start_xmit diff. I'll have to stop reviewing if you skip over parts of the messages. I gave you a TLDR and you skipped over the first bulletpoint. Thanks, -- Th=C3=A9o Lebrun, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com