RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver support

[Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@xilinx.com>]

Hi Sudeep,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla@arm.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 3:47 AM
> To: Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@xilinx.com>; michal.simek@xilinx.com; linux-
> clk@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>; mturquette@baylibre.com;
> sboyd@codeaurora.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver support
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/01/18 20:29, Jolly Shah wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
> > There are 3 things:
> >
> > 1> IPI mailbox transport - series is already posted
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10145795/
> > 2> EEMI - Posted by me below
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10150665/
> > 3> EEMI Users
> > Currently posted as RFC as they are dependent on #2.
> > OK, can #2 and #3 can be put together until initial review ?
> 
> > #2 doesn’t use mailbox so it is a posted as a separate series.
> 
> OK, does it use smc ? If so, the point is treat it as smc mailbox so that smc is just
> a transport and EEMI can be still used with other transport technically.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep


I am not sure if I get you correctly. 
Yes, EEMI uses SMC interface to communicate to PMU. Do you suggest to use Andre's SMC mailbox driver as transport for EEMI? 

Thanks,
Jolly Shah