From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-49.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11A123C3F71 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791875454; cv=none; b=ur07dtlKTU5EWCvkx8gABt/IKujQh6tS+kWOID6PXbIYjbJm/oDDROyJE6eghrM8s5gpU1pHsw+Ssw1mH0Q4W00xUGEltuJez76tTpWI/AmcKD8CLherEG8BoNtmajD4qlaWU9G2ZgscFDtnBJYo8hca9+ugzY3HhGdRrfUS2fA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791875454; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5IyuLLYFiQtpNiYbK6mgmhqjjgM5EmoJ5pKSJ2p2wnU=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Cc:Subject: References:In-Reply-To; b=pApoVG2g0sTk2WqJtnYRy8F1iYQamP9JHqmvkY3jPU5zVzGAFKUiiKVUlVKbn0WS3zFmO4blYcFolQjqWl4fdyuX8NVkF2Zok9yqc6nJ477p5/92H4RXByA8V5kBa48SLslSZvn7gCmrgWKWLgqskVkmg7c3NH7gXIrYHwxjApM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=G08rLVM7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="G08rLVM7" X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=5IyuLLYFiQtpNiYbK6mgmhqjjgM5EmoJ5pKSJ2p2wnU=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1791875451; v=1; x=1792480251; b=G08rLVM7E8sr3m0pu55B/cbUh5E3RnwnMkK1fueg3lNpwhLX8PXjXNZO/z8Z7fKjmvb8TUYr vWRPKGsk6E3oiEZ8IQPlkU+a1JYqNV4qRDTZW2IoKOrJptziKz9QcYICo6R3Zgxn72dEn5hqL0D z3pjQlBVt/dY61YLKtbTDLCE= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 4aa0aab1cb48f3d2; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:10:50 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 4aa0aab1cb48f3d2 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:10:50 +0000 Message-Id: From: "Luka Gejak" To: "Alastair D'Silva" , , "Ping-Ke Shih" , "Kalle Valo" Cc: "Luka Gejak" , "Martin Blumenstingl" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Ulf Hansson" , Subject: Re: [PATCH rtw-next v5 4/4] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Split rtw_sdio_rx_isr into 8051 and 3081 variants X-Mailer: aerc 0.22.0 References: <20261011220755.1673367-1-alastair@d-silva.org> <20261011220755.1673367-5-alastair@d-silva.org> In-Reply-To: <20261011220755.1673367-5-alastair@d-silva.org> On Sun Oct 11, 2026 at 10:07 PM UTC, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > Split rtw_sdio_rx_isr() into separate 8051 and 3081 variants to be > clear. The two differences between the architectures are: > - Register size: REG_SDIO_RX0_REQ_LEN is 16-bit on 8051, 32-bit on 3081. > - HISR behavior: 8051 re-reads REG_SDIO_HISR on each iteration, while > 3081 drains based on rx_len without re-reading HISR. > > This is a refactoring without any logic changes. > > Assisted-by: LLM > Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva > --- Reviewed-by: Luka Gejak Best regards, Luka Gejak