From: "Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@arkamax.eu>
To: "Yu Zhang" <yuz08559@gmail.com>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Chaitanya Kulkarni" <kch@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet: take subsys->lock while force-reconnecting in nvmet_subsys_attr_qid_max_store()
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 08:23:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4CGCPQCBLX.10XJ0BE8OCYH4@arkamax.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014054727.53183-1-yuz08559@gmail.com>
On Wed Oct 14, 2026 at 7:47 AM CEST, Yu Zhang wrote:
> nvmet_subsys_attr_qid_max_store() sets subsys->max_qid and then walks
> subsys->ctrls to force every controller to reconnect, but it holds only
> nvmet_config_sem (for write). subsys->ctrls is protected by subsys->lock:
> nvmet_alloc_ctrl() adds an entry under subsys->lock, and nvmet_ctrl_free()
> removes it under subsys->lock with list_del() + kfree() (not kfree_rcu).
> The free path takes no nvmet_config_sem, so the two locks are independent.
>
> A controller teardown (host disconnect, keep-alive timeout or fatal error
> -> nvmet_sq_destroy() -> nvmet_ctrl_put() -> nvmet_ctrl_free()) can
> therefore list_del() an entry while qid_max_store() is iterating the list,
> corrupting the walk.
>
> KASAN, concurrent "echo 128 > .../subsystems/<nqn>/attr_qid_max" racing
> nvme-loop controllers connecting and disconnecting, panics in seconds:
>
> BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in nvmet_subsys_attr_qid_max_store+0x10d/0x1b0
> Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000090
> Call Trace:
> nvmet_subsys_attr_qid_max_store+0x10d/0x1b0
> configfs_write_iter+0x1a7/0x250
> vfs_write+0x5df/0x940
> ksys_write+0xfd/0x1e0
>
> (also seen as a general-protection fault dereferencing a LIST_POISON
> pointer at the same instruction.)
>
> Take subsys->lock around the list_for_each_entry() loop, matching every
> other subsys->ctrls accessor. ->delete_ctrl() only queues asynchronous
> controller teardown, so it does not re-enter subsys->lock under the loop.
>
> Fixes: 3e980f5995e0 ("nvmet: expose max queues to configfs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yuz08559@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Yu Zhang <yuz08559@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/target/configfs.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/configfs.c b/drivers/nvme/target/configfs.c
> index 1111111..2222222 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/configfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/configfs.c
> @@ -1683,9 +1683,16 @@ static ssize_t nvmet_subsys_attr_qid_max_store(struct config_item *item,
> down_write(&nvmet_config_sem);
> subsys->max_qid = qid_max;
>
> - /* Force reconnect */
> + /*
> + * Force reconnect. subsys->ctrls is protected by subsys->lock
> + * (nvmet_alloc_ctrl()/nvmet_ctrl_free() add and remove entries under
> + * it); take it here too so a concurrent controller teardown cannot
> + * list_del() an entry while this loop walks the list.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&subsys->lock);
> list_for_each_entry(ctrl, &subsys->ctrls, subsys_entry)
> ctrl->ops->delete_ctrl(ctrl);
> + mutex_unlock(&subsys->lock);
> up_write(&nvmet_config_sem);
>
> return cnt;
> --
> 2.43.0
I don't think we need a comment in the source code just to explain that.
It's an established pattern all over the target driver code that accesses
to the subsys->ctrls list are protected by subsys->lock, so this is already implied.
Anyway the fix looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 5:47 Yu Zhang
2026-10-14 6:23 ` Maurizio Lombardi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM4CGCPQCBLX.10XJ0BE8OCYH4@arkamax.eu \
--to=mlombard@arkamax.eu \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuz08559@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®