mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Musham, Sai Krishna" <sai.krishna.musham@amd.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: "bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"lpieralisi@kernel.org" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"kw@linux.com" <kw@linux.com>,
	"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"krzk+dt@kernel.org" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"cassel@kernel.org" <cassel@kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Simek, Michal" <michal.simek@amd.com>,
	"Gogada, Bharat Kumar" <bharat.kumar.gogada@amd.com>,
	"Havalige, Thippeswamy" <thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 2/2] PCI: amd-mdb: Add support for PCIe RP PERST# signal handling
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 06:53:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR12MB6158755F6C6BE98C632D9EB0CD2CA@DM4PR12MB6158.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bozkhw7eebaxj7odsilphvlbfzfo7xmdfteng5dq5mtznroefi@trlegpl6fkcf>

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]

Hi Manivannan,

Thanks for the review.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 7:53 PM
> To: Musham, Sai Krishna <sai.krishna.musham@amd.com>
> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com; lpieralisi@kernel.org; kw@linux.com; robh@kernel.org;
> krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; cassel@kernel.org; linux-
> pci@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Simek, Michal <michal.simek@amd.com>; Gogada, Bharat Kumar
> <bharat.kumar.gogada@amd.com>; Havalige, Thippeswamy
> <thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] PCI: amd-mdb: Add support for PCIe RP PERST#
> signal handling
>
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
> when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 08:39:51AM GMT, Sai Krishna Musham wrote:
> > Add support for handling the AMD Versal Gen 2 MDB PCIe Root Port PERST#
> > signal via a GPIO by parsing the new PCIe bridge node to acquire the
> > reset GPIO. If the bridge node is not found, fall back to acquiring it
> > from the PCIe node.
> >
> > As part of this, update the interrupt controller node parsing to use
> > of_get_child_by_name() instead of of_get_next_child(), since the PCIe
> > node now has multiple children. This ensures the correct node is
> > selected during initialization.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sai Krishna Musham <sai.krishna.musham@amd.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Simplified error checking condition logic.
> > - Removed unnecessary fallback message.
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Add fall back mechanism to acquire reset GPIO from PCIe node when PCIe
> Bridge
> > node is not present.
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Resolve kernel test robot warning.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506241020.rPD1a2Vr-lkp@intel.com/
> > - Update commit message.
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Implement amd_mdb_parse_pcie_port to parse bridge node for reset-gpios
> property.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Change delay to PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS
> >
> > v5 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250711052357.3859719-1-
> sai.krishna.musham@amd.com/
> > v4 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250626054906.3277029-1-
> sai.krishna.musham@amd.com/
> > v3 https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250618080931.2472366-1-
> sai.krishna.musham@amd.com/
> > v2 https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250429090046.1512000-1-
> sai.krishna.musham@amd.com/
> > v1 https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250326041507.98232-1-
> sai.krishna.musham@amd.com/
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-amd-mdb.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-amd-mdb.c
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-amd-mdb.c
> > index 9f7251a16d32..697f5b3fc75e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-amd-mdb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-amd-mdb.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/resource.h>
> >  #include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > +#include "../../pci.h"
> >  #include "pcie-designware.h"
> >
> >  #define AMD_MDB_TLP_IR_STATUS_MISC           0x4C0
> > @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@
> >   * @slcr: MDB System Level Control and Status Register (SLCR) base
> >   * @intx_domain: INTx IRQ domain pointer
> >   * @mdb_domain: MDB IRQ domain pointer
> > + * @perst_gpio: GPIO descriptor for PERST# signal handling
> >   * @intx_irq: INTx IRQ interrupt number
> >   */
> >  struct amd_mdb_pcie {
> > @@ -63,6 +65,7 @@ struct amd_mdb_pcie {
> >       void __iomem                    *slcr;
> >       struct irq_domain               *intx_domain;
> >       struct irq_domain               *mdb_domain;
> > +     struct gpio_desc                *perst_gpio;
> >       int                             intx_irq;
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -284,7 +287,7 @@ static int amd_mdb_pcie_init_irq_domains(struct
> amd_mdb_pcie *pcie,
> >       struct device_node *pcie_intc_node;
> >       int err;
> >
> > -     pcie_intc_node = of_get_next_child(node, NULL);
> > +     pcie_intc_node = of_get_child_by_name(node, "interrupt-controller");
> >       if (!pcie_intc_node) {
> >               dev_err(dev, "No PCIe Intc node found\n");
> >               return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -402,6 +405,34 @@ static int amd_mdb_setup_irq(struct amd_mdb_pcie
> *pcie,
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int amd_mdb_parse_pcie_port(struct amd_mdb_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > +     struct device *dev = pcie->pci.dev;
> > +     struct device_node *pcie_port_node;
> > +
> > +     pcie_port_node = of_get_next_child_with_prefix(dev->of_node, NULL, "pcie");
> > +     if (!pcie_port_node) {
> > +             dev_err(dev, "No PCIe Bridge node found\n");
> > +             return -ENODEV;
> > +     }
> > +
>
> Please use for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix() and get rid of the above check.
> Since this is a scoped variant, you do not need to care about OF node refcount.
>
> If your platform supports only one Root Port, you can add a comment on top that
> the loop will execute only once. Maybe you can also add a TODO so that someone
> could prepare the driver to handle multi Root Ports in the future.
>

Thanks for the review, I have made the changes will send in next patch.

> > +     /* Request the GPIO for PCIe reset signal and assert */
>
> Drop the comment.
>
> > +     pcie->perst_gpio = devm_fwnode_gpiod_get(dev,
> of_fwnode_handle(pcie_port_node),
> > +                                              "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH, NULL);
> > +     if (IS_ERR(pcie->perst_gpio)) {
> > +             if (PTR_ERR(pcie->perst_gpio) != -ENOENT) {
> > +                     of_node_put(pcie_port_node);
> > +                     return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->perst_gpio),
> > +                                          "Failed to request reset GPIO\n");
> > +             }
> > +             pcie->perst_gpio = NULL;
>
> Not required.
>
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     of_node_put(pcie_port_node);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int amd_mdb_add_pcie_port(struct amd_mdb_pcie *pcie,
> >                                struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> > @@ -426,6 +457,14 @@ static int amd_mdb_add_pcie_port(struct
> amd_mdb_pcie *pcie,
> >
> >       pp->ops = &amd_mdb_pcie_host_ops;
> >
> > +     if (pcie->perst_gpio) {
> > +             mdelay(PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS);
> > +
> > +             /* Deassert the reset signal */
> > +             gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pcie->perst_gpio, 0);
> > +             mdelay(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS);
> > +     }
> > +
> >       err = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> >       if (err) {
> >               dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize host, err=%d\n", err);
> > @@ -444,6 +483,7 @@ static int amd_mdb_pcie_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >       struct amd_mdb_pcie *pcie;
> >       struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > +     int ret;
> >
> >       pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> >       if (!pcie)
> > @@ -454,6 +494,26 @@ static int amd_mdb_pcie_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >
> >       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> >
> > +     ret = amd_mdb_parse_pcie_port(pcie);
> > +
>
> Spurious newline
>
> > +     /*
> > +      * If amd_mdb_parse_pcie_port returns -ENODEV, it indicates that the
> > +      * PCIe Bridge node was not found in the device tree. This is not
> > +      * considered a fatal error and will trigger a fallback where the
> > +      * reset GPIO is acquired directly from the PCIe node.
>
> s/PCIe node/PCIe Host Bridge node
>
> > +      */
> > +     if (ret == -ENODEV) {
>
> Please use the below pattern:
>
>         if (ret) {
>                 if (ret != -ENODEV) {
>                         dev_err();
>                         return ret;
>                 }
>
>                 pcie->perst_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional()...
>         }
>
> > +
>
> Spurious newline
>
> > +             /* Request the GPIO for PCIe reset signal and assert */
>
> Drop the comment
>

Sure, I have followed above instructions, will send in next patch.
Thanks

> - Mani
>
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Regards,
Sai Krishna

      reply	other threads:[~2025-08-07  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-19  3:09 [PATCH v6 0/2] Add support for AMD Versal Gen 2 MDB PCIe RP PERST# Sai Krishna Musham
2025-07-19  3:09 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: amd-mdb: Add example usage of reset-gpios for " Sai Krishna Musham
2025-07-19  3:09 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] PCI: amd-mdb: Add support for PCIe RP PERST# signal handling Sai Krishna Musham
2025-07-21 21:54   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-07-23  5:30     ` Musham, Sai Krishna
2025-07-23 14:22   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-08-07  6:53     ` Musham, Sai Krishna [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM4PR12MB6158755F6C6BE98C632D9EB0CD2CA@DM4PR12MB6158.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=sai.krishna.musham@amd.com \
    --cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=thippeswamy.havalige@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®