From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com (sendmail.purelymail.com [34.202.193.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB585293ED for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 13:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=34.202.193.197 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792072639; cv=none; b=XDQRMXTyNc/N/tR8UQmDUUKeCLIUAP+l/UU9eiHMFtRHdh9Q7jFeJkA6JtoDLAGyXxTMPMTiCBXBme9gnZjJDRvIGUETiuNiL49VMGHLeLw1UOHNHqzqUteRqBh4xzgdOMZ5E3f1mRVIy7EHnLoCw1sTwp8hDnLwhjxa21NZILE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792072639; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7jNLKwOqbiWEPHrbrn0pf17cBjhNkg4KpFVZkY9bEs8=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=Pz3k71lOC2jyfzx1/OHRPfNSjo95LdfQsLtD04t1MbwfM4LtwN/AjyYH9FeB2RtUWzO+LEXXeToYC9ceteTPLrWwQlPq0aah4bjhmbLf5pOBohNPcMTnzHM67mMuDxLcB3fBZaSkuYh/4ndRknut27r9ZRSa2oRKE8TZn5wZqSI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=rcpassos.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rcpassos.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rcpassos.me header.i=@rcpassos.me header.b=DBUAR6WU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=purelymail.com header.i=@purelymail.com header.b=B1SMUW5b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=34.202.193.197 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=rcpassos.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rcpassos.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rcpassos.me header.i=@rcpassos.me header.b="DBUAR6WU"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=purelymail.com header.i=@purelymail.com header.b="B1SMUW5b" DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=DBUAR6WUtGCJIDLmDkTw/YNGCZfLM+o2BzaEHe81C7uetRQVqJm7PoNbpt2//lNqWz8Eer3Mh6fSDd+Yk6oFZiekuxTzZX+Z66QYv8OvFnEbJEJ5CBfVuHBuUx+nLHz2Ysqs2e3YkQRUFAejwOIRa8mD4dlLExHJUQdMd+ddIJCZ6ybkQOd73RJwjHdwPd/dQhxX315Zui+IE2Ec7K13NuC+D4mKv61fL1qeUgEzHUd/S8kAbP8qIkZnL+hQBunugEOEPpAak/LMWwk1pwRbE4lNbSpU0OTY1xpATlq5gAr/1DPwKswJoc2zfsSbOGLEUVek9LXV0ydG5eQnexutew==; s=purelymail3; d=rcpassos.me; v=1; bh=7jNLKwOqbiWEPHrbrn0pf17cBjhNkg4KpFVZkY9bEs8=; h=Received:Date:Subject:From:To; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=B1SMUW5bm8TJO1aMihwKHaPgNu4RxDeyhVlh1H1q84XLNyUzsp6UrQpo3in4EV5SFkwGnyOq6XvEUpLIeWcZBIK+lrtxterLxvNi2Kn6dWKDw0DlBN3IfTaTM3vO0is4D/HR8d4dPjxy6uFeccqH6ynoo4yy/02KzJq6GcP7TARXfa2tkwlYprk4O352GzG+0T3GfZFtxRMUX/Q5+EUX5gxy1lL0WIqSewXVmAYfV6sLRDtiwMjhK2Q+OIjtQiTroq/1NgiOH8/Xh2GgId4t4+9cx8PTYjxkvYliADE/+VvtvxVzMj/hYBwRXP6sHtePXO4qFveFzGWcdwe1GXtmyA==; s=purelymail3; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=7jNLKwOqbiWEPHrbrn0pf17cBjhNkg4KpFVZkY9bEs8=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:Date:Subject:From:To; Feedback-ID: 45355:7809:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Authentication-Results: purelymail.com; auth=pass Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id -957297502; (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Thu, 15 Oct 2026 13:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:56:51 -0300 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust_binder: avoid overflow in get_node_debug_info() Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" , "Boqun Feng" , "Gary Guo" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Benno Lossin" , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Trevor Gross" , "Danilo Krummrich" , "Daniel Almeida" , "Tamir Duberstein" , "Alexandre Courbot" , =?utf-8?q?Onur_=C3=96zkan?= , , , From: "Rafael Passos" To: "Alice Ryhl" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Carlos Llamas" , "Rafael Passos" X-Mailer: aerc 0.22.0 References: <20261015-binder-debug-info-overflow-v1-1-81fffb74d288@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20261015-binder-debug-info-overflow-v1-1-81fffb74d288@google.com> I wish I had though of that when making the previous change. A very elegant check, as returning "out"" with the default value is safe :) Reviewed-by: Rafael Passos Thanks (and sorry), Rafael Passos