From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com (mail-pj1-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADFA04A8FD1 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 15:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792163182; cv=none; b=a5knx43YfGNv5n/Dm0IwBljwlZ1C2RtMC5FdC5QI4enGs4QfDtk6UEtRLtmo4Ws1hrwq6r2enqoK3CmUYdfrjFRQGOaf2KYQPN80nEyVCgq7Wj5jDBR4FduzVUqwWsYLX30gXwUt7JkL6atspIot27igZ6PF+Z9oPt5gDc0OCXc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792163182; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F9tVYstefVXNBFGdnpQ2yzC11l3f4oySkF0wmLDMJRg=; h=Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version; b=YdT3pNouUXDs4/5JVbwIu9rap0i7VLcoq+E1PEyiYm32FjdV65qn6B3DstB4WHOEOP4PGqifaWcxecaR07wVZwvWkC5cA8EsosZzLR1d9kGU443cOAKMfWMTNzw6InsNKDEf5D5ekEMaK1qpnVdzOt8EhG7/kwDvFYjmr8O9UbA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=QyQaJg3F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="QyQaJg3F" Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3ab3260b2cdso52945a91.1 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 08:06:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1792163181; x=1792767981; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date:content-type:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=R0/kOu9Vo/zJiBjLTBWedq2zmfz3+xfDwpc4EXkFj1g=; b=QyQaJg3FOWuUZCIJGv0XttYjGmZ7QcAuO9HnZkcj3S69RVeZoDzMSqQ7yFB3VQBxuk GCpm9cqT+Yi/4c9NoysajS4xVeTmckI7sLpwmSgbPDQu8qvhWrK3t7gQyTLRc37RjR6Y UD6KMTe8qEql7olxy53oYZuFDjXJywYsZ+Pt91ZbVvS/TZTdpNBfMzkTdXkn1qDrwj59 Nw2n7M87O/FOnGbCMfQ/HVwk0oDpikubVWVsv67cZhS7gqsaZf1aSdgxqw7IkmgkhThr DY8fYh6XggSYtGmZeCQ3LNt9aBKn07h4AGNzAt9v8o/Smxe9tz0/XKUB1GtERWVpWzrp kXwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792163181; x=1792767981; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date:content-type:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=R0/kOu9Vo/zJiBjLTBWedq2zmfz3+xfDwpc4EXkFj1g=; b=FfotnDAWC3WiolSnsPPrdY48G3yfMUF6CYnQzLsdxs7OsfR0g4dhrCPSnFUhFuUzMN Mw4Ujmg8IcwjICghf5srdcrwi17SmmYxamOaTmPkz1OnEMWPsUlFg87ZIoTQoPUIEA69 cNslTypxjJOn7G7Pv87ZZgK/FMYo9KVcpZRvA893NUBOXnnzCl+oUyRSN/4aJqt0j/fk UJbcXwrK2+WkhWbdVzcnWvDm21NPq5SuXIEmF6Pe6sa8BJm1kbsdBQx5hBGpdfwmtxcI rV2dtclzSjNeo4dm1Vx/7J/rIsK9O9W9v1il3gkA2FYvdfJen9HUZS7rHdNYDdicPP73 OIzg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBzvCDvje7j7/h1Bcj9dLSPCQZNC8cqD5K2tnNwD7CcOG3/QuqOfV53JnHLgoDi4uE/jYbnb81MZIH3cMGs=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYIpeRhbTuzmjP5PRbhWizBDTKxBbUNaL1aUxYaeoX1EbxDtIswH VvJ8m9HAQYMJkuu7Df9nIrX6V5xDuPnZTD4lhf+5HBZFeWvXEd6YPiYY X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou1/F6VrHqISHPb7Q1sZNOVNKWokHM/mk9FdzJ0gNFjNGKqqNagIt7ISNVB2ej+ kSaa/kaI8JjDXtoZJ5Mcr5BaBdCV2WCzEF5kSvMfvMtgqQle3ijH73fJe3p/LUIhpYcz6nrGNOn PjnsTUoIa+wiyMwQCXci9Xm/nj3eQnZp6KmN3Q31WLii6yot0Nerx0TNYwYdzXkgcSmOhD6cy4b N//DXj8mjQnOj0CjPtg9wmqcPyNgCYId4/21SgYkLhIi2xpSHRcAkbKwBQd5Tj+mrPf14rcfJEL 0+nXRwJgH6sufhU5LcJL8A0uh2uEbcrTVe5/QJ0e0pRKPeaQ1Mb45+Tpsep6wAcWl7XqREZauR5 mnQyRq7w4doJ2SHvljmq6BzQK5K2biByp8rEVXWHeSTxUbV4/fKozrbJXlriUrmXczeVYu2rAhG 0uw72UAhve7mtQsui0JpZlEigfIkhkS/m+T80ougwE0N59NCNbIXSPgOoLgaPseA/Eu1PpG1vQl if7CbwBZHp3rMOYmOuQ8j0sY05bA8Y0vuNxrD6TAI4353st0qHA5DFFoXtBymz0F3qMXXmdi7GZ GWml2VKsweV0dUE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:17d1:b0:3a0:ace4:d2b4 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3aceec25263mr109707a91.23.1792163180660; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 08:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([153.61.198.246]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-3acd05c9255sm1984298a91.2.2026.10.16.08.06.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Oct 2026 08:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 15:06:19 +0000 Message-Id: From: "Alexei Starovoitov" To: "Jiayuan Chen" , Cc: "Kaiyan Mei" , "Yinhao Hu" , "Dongliang Mu" , "Daniel Borkmann" , "John Fastabend" , "Stanislav Fomichev" , "Martin KaFai Lau" , "Andrii Nakryiko" , "Eduard Zingerman" , "Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" , "Song Liu" , "Yonghong Song" , "Jiri Olsa" , "Emil Tsalapatis" , "Ihor Solodrai" , "David S. Miller" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Jakub Kicinski" , "Paolo Abeni" , "Simon Horman" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix verifier WARN on narrow read of bpf_tcp_sock u64 fields In-Reply-To: <20261016111643.247553-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> References: <20261016111643.247553-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> X-Mailer: mkdraft (claude review draft; edit before sending) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 07:16 PM Jiayuan Chen wrote: > Just disallow the narrower access by matching the whole u64 range of the > two fields, so it is turned down at check time: > > invalid tcp_sock access off=84 size=4 Pls add a selftest as patch 2. progs/verifier_sock.c already has "bpf_tcp_sock(skb->sk): tp->bytes_acked". Copy it and do u32 load at offsetof(bytes_received) + 4 and at offsetof(bytes_acked) + 4 with __failure __msg("invalid tcp_sock access") __failure_unpriv. cgroup/skb is loadable by unpriv, so both modes should be covered. See commit ba578b87fe2b ("selftests/bpf: Test invalid narrower ctx load") that Paul added for the same warn in ctx fields. I'm hesitating to apply it as-is, since all earlier fixes for this warn came with a test. pw-bot: cr