From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Return a bsg request immediatley if eh-in-progress
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 17:24:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB6575F4831649503EE848C4CFFC919@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa7dae1f-06ac-9d5a-616d-cc00c38e5feb@acm.org>
> On 11/8/21 4:08 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
> > ufs-bsg is attempting to access the device from user-space, and it is
> > unaware of the internal driver flows, specifically if error handling is
> > currently ongoing.
> >
> > Fixes: 5e0a86eed846 (scsi: ufs: Add API to execute raw upiu commands)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > index 3869bb57769b..828061c05909 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -6830,6 +6830,9 @@ int ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba
> *hba,
> > enum utp_ocs ocs_value;
> > u8 tm_f = be32_to_cpu(req_upiu->header.dword_1) >> 16 &
> MASK_TM_FUNC;
> >
> > + if (!ufshcd_is_user_access_allowed(hba))
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > +
> > switch (msgcode) {
> > case UPIU_TRANSACTION_NOP_OUT:
> > cmd_type = DEV_CMD_TYPE_NOP;
>
> Making operations fail if error handling is in progress makes it harder than
> necessary to write user space software that uses the BSG interface. Has it
> been considered to wait inside ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd() until error
> handling
> has finished?
I am not sure.
I would expect a retry / polling / other, if any, to be done in user-space and not in the kernel.
e.g. a common practice in the code that send SG_IO or other ioctls is to retry on EBUSY.
Not sure that this is the case in ufs-utils though.
Thanks,
Avri
Thanks,
Avri
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-08 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-08 12:08 [PATCH 0/2] scsi: ufs: Block user-space access " Avri Altman
2021-11-08 12:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Inline eh-in-progress states Avri Altman
2021-11-08 12:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Return a bsg request immediatley if eh-in-progress Avri Altman
2021-11-08 17:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-08 17:24 ` Avri Altman [this message]
2021-11-08 17:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-08 18:00 ` Avri Altman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR04MB6575F4831649503EE848C4CFFC919@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®