From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Weiming Shi" <bestswngs@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, "Xiang Mei" <xmei5@asu.edu>,
<co+eada64ce90ecebce@bugs.sh>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Validate stack arg reads against caller state
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 00:03:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMA2R8KIUPO2.SR26IDI6VG35@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007174203.37071-1-bestswngs@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 10:42 AM Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com> wrote:
> then read a slot that the caller never allocated or initialized. Async
> callback verification also starts at curframe zero, so subtracting one
> to find a caller can underflow the frame array.
Sync callbacks are broken too and this patch doesn't help:
*(u64 *)(r11 - 8) = r6;
r1 = 1;
r2 = cb ll;
...
call bpf_loop;
where cb() has 6 args in BTF and does r1 = *(u64 *)(r11 + 8).
The slot is written, so check_outgoing_stack_args() called from
push_callback_call() passes. push_stack() copies stack_arg_regs[]
of the caller and the load in cb() gets the state of r6.
set_loop_callback_state() marks R3-R5 as not init, but stack args
stay readable.
At run-time bpf_loop(), when not inlined, calls cb(i, ctx, 0, 0, 0).
x86 JIT reads arg6 from r9 and arg7 from the stack frame of bpf_loop().
The verifier thinks it's a map value, but it's garbage.
No helper or kfunc passes more than 5 args to a callback.
Reject callbacks with bpf_in_stack_arg_cnt() in push_callback_call().
> + if (!vstate->curframe) {
> + verbose(env, "invalid read from stack arg off %d without caller\n", off);
> + return -EACCES;
> + }
> +
Only async callback can get here with curframe == 0.
With the above it's rejected earlier. Drop this check.
Add sync and async callback tests to patch 2.
Also mention in the log that
commit 4286f5deee14 ("bpf: Validate outgoing stack args when btf_prepare_func_args fails")
closed this hole for the first call only.
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 17:42 Weiming Shi
2026-10-07 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test missing caller stack argument slots Weiming Shi
2026-10-07 18:35 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Validate stack arg reads against caller state bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-21 0:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMA2R8KIUPO2.SR26IDI6VG35@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=co+eada64ce90ecebce@bugs.sh \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®