On Fri Oct 23, 2026 at 11:24 AM CEST, Shuai Liu wrote:
> Drop the else branch following an if that always returns, and move
> the trailing comment onto the fall-through path. Cosmetic only, no
> functional change; silences a checkpatch WARNING.

So what is the checkpatch warning? IMHO that change make the
readability worse.

-michael

>
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Liu <847807867@qq.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
> index 235070b21..3b8176b9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
> @@ -135,9 +135,9 @@ static bool spi_nor_check_lock_status_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs,
>  	if (locked)
>  		/* Requested range is a sub-range of locked range */
>  		return (offs_max <= lock_offs_max) && (ofs >= lock_offs);
> -	else
> -		/* Requested range does not overlap with locked range */
> -		return (ofs >= lock_offs_max) || (offs_max <= lock_offs);
> +
> +	/* Requested range does not overlap with locked range */
> +	return (ofs >= lock_offs_max) || (offs_max <= lock_offs);
>  }
>  
>  bool spi_nor_is_locked_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len, const u8 *sr)