From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: "Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
Cc: "John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>, "Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
<nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel" <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the receive path
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 10:08:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMF7WDQV4EUC.1GJ9LDZRFXMSI@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DMA55SJ39DQU.2NWD9I1FRH4Z8@nvidia.com>
On Wed Oct 21, 2026 at 10:56 AM JST, Eliot Courtney wrote:
> On Tue Oct 20, 2026 at 7:08 PM JST, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> `receive_msg` currently handles both the transport and RPC layers.
>> Retire it and split its logic between the new `consume_element`, a
>> transport-level method which passes the parsed message contents to a
>> closure before advancing the CPU read pointer past it, and the
>> already-existing `await_msg`, which calls `consume_element` with a
>> closure matching the RPC message.
>>
>> This introduces a small behavioral change: a matched RPC message that is
>> too short to contain the message component itself no longer stalls the
>> queue. This behavior is justified because it fixes an inconsistency:
>> unmatched RPC messages were always skipped, whereas matched RPC messages
>> could block the queue if they were too short. While a misconstructed RPC
>> message is a problem, it is not a fatal queue error as long as the
>> transport framing and checksum are valid.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> - /// Receive a message from the GSP.
>> + /// Wait for the next element on the message queue, pass it to `f`, advance the read pointer
>> + /// past the message, and returns the result of `f`.
>> ///
>> - /// A message whose function code is `M::FUNCTION` is decoded and returned. Any other message
>> - /// is logged as an event.
>> - ///
>> - /// The read pointer is always advanced past the message, regardless of whether it matched.
>> + /// The read pointer advances regardless of whether `f` succeeds or not.
>> ///
>> /// # Errors
>> ///
>> /// - `ETIMEDOUT` if `timeout` has elapsed before any message becomes available.
>> - /// - `EIO` if a message fails framing or checksum validation.
>> - /// - `ENOMSG` if the message was not the awaited reply.
>> + /// - `EIO` if a message fails framing or checksum validation. In this case, the read pointer
>> + /// does not advance and the queue is stalled. This is a fatal error.
>> ///
>> - /// Error codes returned by [`MessageFromGsp::read`] are propagated as-is.
>> - fn receive_msg<M: MessageFromGsp>(&mut self, timeout: Delta) -> Result<M>
>> - where
>> - // This allows all error types, including `Infallible`, to be used for `M::InitError`.
>> - Error: From<M::InitError>,
>> - {
>> + /// If an error is returned, then `f` has not been called.
>
> optional nit: Clarify in a comment that w.r.t. `EIO` and `f` not being
> called, that only applies for the outermost Err. i.e., we do have
> R = Result<>, so we have Result<Result<>> but we're only talking about
> the outer (transport) Result here. Maybe one way to clarify this is
> that `R` contains the output of the message layer and may itself
> be a Result<>, and this function returns a Result for the transport
> layer. Not sure of the best way to phrase it but you know what I mean.
Given that `R` is produced by `f` this is more or less explicit I think,
but I'll add the following to remove all ambiguity:
/// Note that `R` may itself be a `Result`. In this case, the above only applies to the outer
/// `Result` returned by this method.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 10:08 [PATCH v5 00/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: prepare the command queue for r000 dual-message types Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: remove stale comment Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 11:43 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: simplify framing error description Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 11:43 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: validate checksum earlier on receive Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: introduce and use proper RpcMessageHeader type Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: group the RPC-specific part of send_single_command Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the send path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split RPC parsing part of the receive path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: move RPC message logging to RpcMessage Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the receive path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-21 1:56 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-27 1:08 ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: extract await_msg_with from await_msg Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-21 2:00 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: use consume_element to implement drain Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-21 2:58 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: move the RPC code into a sub-module Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: move the RPC commands " Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add `rpc` to RPC message send/receive methods Alexandre Courbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMF7WDQV4EUC.1GJ9LDZRFXMSI@nvidia.com \
--to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®