From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Nico Pache" <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
"Ryan Roberts" <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"Dev Jain" <dev.jain@arm.com>, "Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>,
"Lance Yang" <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
"Usama Arif" <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
"Kiryl Shutsemau" <kas@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm: add and use mmap_read_lock[_killable]_nosteal() on contention
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 16:23:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMNF03AQLNXY.27PRD8XBEYX77@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a77219e-39e5-4e98-8f88-6f90bccf69f0@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 02:16 AM David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org> wrote:
> On 11/3/26 09:27, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
>> With down_read[_killable]_nosteal() available, it becomes possible to
>> release the mmap read lock in such a way that a queued write lock always
>> takes precedence.
>>
>> Expose this to mm through two new wrappers - mmap_read_lock_nosteal() and
>> mmap_read_lock_killable_nosteal().
>>
>> Make use of this in scenarios where the mmap read lock is dropped
>> explicitly for the purposes of relieving mmap_lock contention - the BPF
>> task VMA iterator, and lock_next_vma_under_mmap_lock(), which is where
>> /proc/$pid/smaps_rollup re-acquires the mmap lock after dropping it on
>> contention and falling back from per-VMA locking.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> include/linux/mmap_lock.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 2 +-
>
>
> I'd appreciate an ack from BPF folks and a confirmation that I could take this
> through my tree :)
Sure. Pls take it through your tree.
No conflicts with bpf and bpf-next.
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 8:27 [PATCH 0/5] mm/khugepaged: bound mmap_lock hold time when walking an mm's VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-03 8:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] Revert "mm/khugepaged: remove definition of struct khugepaged_mm_slot" Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-04 7:46 ` Lance Yang
2026-11-05 10:17 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-03 8:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/khugepaged: scan mm's more efficiently under mmap_lock contention Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-04 8:43 ` Lance Yang
2026-11-05 10:23 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-05 14:01 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-03 8:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] locking/rwsem: add down_read[_killable]_nosteal() Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-03 11:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-03 12:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-05 10:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-05 10:29 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-03 8:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: add and use mmap_read_lock[_killable]_nosteal() on contention Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-05 10:16 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-05 14:02 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-05 16:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-11-03 8:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/khugepaged: drop/reacquire mmap read lock if skipped enough VMAs Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-05 10:28 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-05 14:46 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMNF03AQLNXY.27PRD8XBEYX77@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®