From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Vladislav Zaharov" <vladazaharova2018@gmail.com>,
<jhubbard@nvidia.com>, <aliceryhl@google.com>, <ttabi@nvidia.com>,
<gary@garyguo.net>, <nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] gpu: nova-core: move the debugfs root into the module data
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 14:14:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMP087IP6EDP.2QB7783SVNV2T@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DMOS00OZYWU5.2SUZRN37DEH87@nvidia.com>
On Sat Nov 7, 2026 at 7:47 AM CET, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Thu Oct 15, 2026 at 12:45 AM JST, Vladislav Zaharov wrote:
> Another thing: since this is declaring now a proper interface, can you
> move `DebugfsData`, `debugfs_data` and `DEBUGFS_DATA` into a sub-module,
> say `debugfs.rs`?
I think that makes sense.
>> impl InPlaceModule for NovaCoreModule {
>> fn init(module: &'static kernel::ThisModule) -> impl PinInit<Self, Error> {
>> - let dir = debugfs::Dir::new(c"nova-core");
>> -
>> - // SAFETY: We are the only driver code running during init, so there
>> - // cannot be any concurrent access to `DEBUGFS_ROOT`.
>> - unsafe { DEBUGFS_ROOT = Some(dir) };
>> -
>> try_pin_init!(Self {
>> + _debugfs <- DebugfsData::new(),
>> + _: {
>> + // SAFETY: Nothing reads `DEBUGFS_DATA` before a device is bound, which cannot
>> + // happen until the driver is registered below. What it points at is dropped only
>> + // once the driver is unregistered, so it is valid for as long as any device is
>> + // bound, and nothing reads it outside of that.
>> + unsafe { DEBUGFS_DATA = &*_debugfs };
>> + },
>
> Let's move this initialization into `DebugfsData::new`, using
> `pin_chain`:
>
> /// Returns an initializer that creates the shared debugfs data.
> ///
> /// # Safety
> ///
> /// The returned initializer must be run exactly once before the driver is registered. The
> /// initialized [`DebugfsData`] must outlive the driver registration.
> pub(super) unsafe fn new() -> impl PinInit<Self> {
> pin_init!(Self {
> root: debugfs::Dir::new(c"nova-core"),
> })
> .pin_chain(|debugfs| {
> // SAFETY: Per the method's safety block, the driver is not registered yet, meaning that
> // no device can be probed and thus nothing can access `DEBUGFS_DATA` concurrently.
> //
> // INVARIANT: Per the method's safety block, `DEBUGFS_DATA` is written before the driver
> // is registered and points to a valid instance of `DebugfsData`, which is pinned
> // and dropped after the driver is unregistered.
> unsafe { DEBUGFS_DATA = &*debugfs };
> Ok(())
> })
> }
>
> That way, the burden of enforcing the invariants for `DEBUGFS_DATA`
> relies exclusively on `new` (and we made it unsafe to force the caller
> to do that).
Actually, I would leave that part as is.
Eventually we'll have registration data for driver registrations to share module
data. Once we have that, we'd need to change DebugfsData::new() again and move
that part bnack into NovaCoreModule::init().
Besides that, DebugfsData has nothing to do with the current limitation of
publishing module data to driver registrations; the module code seems like the
correct place to deal with this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 15:45 [PATCH v6 0/3] gpu: nova-core: retain the GSP-RM log buffers Vladislav Zaharov
2026-10-14 15:45 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] gpu: nova-core: move the debugfs root into the module data Vladislav Zaharov
2026-11-07 1:23 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-11-07 6:47 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-11-07 13:14 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-11-07 13:32 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-14 15:45 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] gpu: nova-core: gsp: retain the GSP-RM log buffers after unbind Vladislav Zaharov
2026-11-07 1:26 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-14 15:45 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] Documentation: nova: remove completed GSP log buffer task Vladislav Zaharov
2026-11-06 20:51 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] gpu: nova-core: retain the GSP-RM log buffers Timur Tabi
2026-11-06 22:52 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-11-06 23:15 ` John Hubbard
2026-11-06 23:08 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-11-06 23:15 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-11-07 0:39 ` John Hubbard
2026-11-07 1:38 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-11-07 1:40 ` John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMP087IP6EDP.2QB7783SVNV2T@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
--cc=vladazaharova2018@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®