From: "Vladimir Vdovin" <deliran@verdict.gg>
To: <netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org>, "Vladimir Vdovin" <deliran@verdict.gg>
Cc: "David Ahern" <dsahern@kernel.org>,
"Ido Schimmel" <idosch@nvidia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@kernel.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] ipv4/ipv6: Cache pmtu on all paths of a multipath route
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:20:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMS9R6RG6OKW.15NILH6RW6578@verdict.gg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179430520494.488859.8396860489135491042@kernel.org>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 10:06:44AM +0000, netdev-bot+sinfo wrote:
> - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
> development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
> analysis tool scan.
Patch 2 (ipv6) is the counterpart of the IPv4 issue fixed in commit
7d3f3b4367f3 ("net: ipv4: Cache pmtu for all packet paths if multipath
enabled") [1]: a host with two ECMP uplinks and a smaller MTU further
down the path had flows blackholing after a Packet Too Big. The IPv6
side was deferred back then at David's request [2]. The new pmtu.sh
tests in patch 3 reproduce it and fail without patch 2.
Patch 1 (ipv4) was found by code inspection while reworking v1 after
the Sashiko (LLM) review of it [3]: the same "replace the exception"
step that review flagged in the IPv6 code is in the IPv4 fan-out from
7d3f3b4367f3 as well.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241108093427.317942-1-deliran@verdict.gg/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ad29493c-9e48-4a94-b327-e47af3a9d137@kernel.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/179236119085.3135.2701233313088371263@kernel.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 9:59 Vladimir Vdovin
2026-11-10 9:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] ipv4: Don't raise a cached pmtu from another path's Packet Too Big Vladimir Vdovin
2026-11-10 9:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] ipv6: Cache pmtu for all paths of a multipath route Vladimir Vdovin
2026-11-10 9:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] selftests: net: pmtu: Add IPv6 and asymmetric multipath tests Vladimir Vdovin
2026-11-10 10:06 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] ipv4/ipv6: Cache pmtu on all paths of a multipath route netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-11 9:20 ` Vladimir Vdovin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMS9R6RG6OKW.15NILH6RW6578@verdict.gg \
--to=deliran@verdict.gg \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®