On Mon, 9 Nov 2026 12:10:10 +0100, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> Honestly I'd still rather have the k3-bs01dcma-rv2768.dts. It's hard
> to predict the future and I think having the extra file is a very
> small price to pay compared to the confusion of having
> 'spacemit,k3-bs01dcma' describe the RV2768 server and then something
> else to describe the module, that's actually called just BS01DCMA if
> someone ever makes a different carrier for the module. Also it makes
> the physical reality of the RV2768 being a server of multiple BS01DCMA
> modules more obvious from just reading the device trees.

Fair enough, I'll split it in v2: k3-bs01dcma.dtsi for the module and
k3-bs01dcma-rv2768.dts for the RV2768, with
"spacemit,k3-bs01dcma-rv2768", "spacemit,k3-bs01dcma", "spacemit,k3"
as the compatible.

-- 
Troy Mitchell