mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Samium Gromoff" <_deepfire@mail.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: /proc tweaking
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:33:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E13vh9C-0001mM-00@f6.mail.ru> (raw)

on Tue, 14 Nov 2000 Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>In article <E13vevy-0003Lv-00@f4.mail.ru> you wrote:
>>            Hey people, i`ve got such a thought
>>     not long ago:
>>       all boxes are different, but the /proc/sys/vm
>>       defaults are equal for every people, so there
>>       is a good issue in getting more performance
>>       from linux, just by making a way to autoadjust
>>       these mysterious values according to amount of
>>       RAM/swap and speed of CPU!  Or this can be >done
>>       in userspace with an utility which look also
>>       on the field of box` use (eg workstation, >>server        etc...)
>>           But who can make this better than the >>people        who hack the kernel?
>>           And i wonder why such a issue is not >>clearly        covered? (maybe
>>i`m making mistake?)
>>           This can also be done for >>proc/sys/net/*...
>
>
>Take a look at powertweak. >http://powertweak.sourceforge.net
>Made by kernel people, for non-kernel people.

      Maybe i were not enough exact, but i`ve meant
   addition of some intelligence to tweaking /proc
   e.g. something what automates tuning, not only
   providing interface to such actions.
      But after lookthru ptweaks source i realized
   what its ONLY interface (to proc), and MAYBE
   it does some PCI tuning (really intelligent 
   choices to advance system`s performance).
      BTW powertweak is a port from unfamous MD,
   therefore when it was created NO proc tuning
   was in mind...

      There is another argument, telling what doing        autotune is ugly by design.... but thats another        issue.

   Sorry for poor english/lameness


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

             reply	other threads:[~2000-11-14 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-11-14 14:33 Samium Gromoff [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-14 23:57 davej
2000-11-14 12:11 Samium Gromoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E13vh9C-0001mM-00@f6.mail.ru \
    --to=_deepfire@mail.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®