From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:50:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:49:58 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:1800 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:49:43 -0500 Subject: Re: Module section warning To: jamagallon@able.es (J . A . Magallon) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 20:51:46 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel) In-Reply-To: <20010105210616.A872@werewolf.able.es> from "J . A . Magallon" at Jan 05, 2001 09:06:16 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > o binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v > o modutils 2.4.0 # insmod -V > > and 2.4 uses gas instead of as86 for real mode. > > Are not that versions enough to delete the > __asm__(".section .modinfo\n\t.previous"); > in module.h ? Firstly they are guidelines for x86. Secondly certain configs need the updates so its pretty invasive to force it yet - 2.5.0 yes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/