From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:21:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:21:43 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:9745 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:21:21 -0500 Subject: Re: khttpd beaten by boa To: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin) Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:22:59 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <93mkpk$98k$1@cesium.transmeta.com> from "H. Peter Anvin" at Jan 12, 2001 02:03:32 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > TUX is evidence that khttpd can be done properly and > > beat the pants off of anything done in userspace. > > > > Then why don't we unload khttpd and put in Tux? Tux needs the zero copy patches I believe so zero copy has to precede it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/