From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 04:35:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 04:35:06 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:28426 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 7 Apr 2001 04:34:53 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4.3 tcp window id causes problems talking to windows clients To: kstone@trivergent.net (Kevin Stone) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 09:36:47 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3ACE14EA.2030502@trivergent.net> from "Kevin Stone" at Apr 06, 2001 03:11:38 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > to be working quite well (except for the lack of swap reclamation-- I > appreciate the reasoning, but it makes upgrading older machines very > difficult.) However, I would rather, for maintenance and sanity -ac will acquire swap cache reclaim in time, dunno about Linus tree but I assume it will once it has 0 cost on hot paths. Right now there are serious 2.4 vm correctness issues to fix first. > Is there any plan to include the zerocopy patches into the stock kernel? > The win2k dial-up/window id problem is really a showstopper but hasn't > generated much traffic on lkml or the digests. > I'd hope so. The binfmt_misc and file size security holes that are fixed in -ac I also want to try and push to Linus for 2.4.4