From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 16:42:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 16:42:23 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:50443 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 May 2001 16:42:17 -0400 Subject: Re: DPT I2O RAID and Linux I2O To: patrick.allaire@isaacnewtontech.com (Patrick Allaire) Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 21:46:09 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Patrick Allaire" at May 01, 2001 02:34:51 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Is this I2O implementation supporting PCI devices ? Yes > Yesterday I post something about that, I have a CompactPCI computer with 2 > computers in it. One master and one slave. The slave one, is has a non > transparent pci-to-pci bridge : DEC (INTEL) 21554, wich support I2O > messaging, I want both computer to communicate by this mean, but I cant seam I2O messaging and I2O protocol are two things. Most sane vendors use I2O messaging hardware to implement something that looks a little more like a device control protocol than SNA. Alan