From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S132807AbREBLqF>; Wed, 2 May 2001 07:46:05 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S132822AbREBLp4>; Wed, 2 May 2001 07:45:56 -0400
Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:27663 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S132807AbREBLpg>; Wed, 2 May 2001 07:45:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Broken gcc ?
To: agodbole@mahindrabt.com (Amarendra GODBOLE)
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 12:48:32 +0100 (BST)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20010502143741.A12251@mahindrabt.com> from "Amarendra GODBOLE" at May 02, 2001 02:37:41 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E14uv7T-0003TY-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> If I recall correctly, RHL 7 shipped with a broken gcc. Has it been 
> fixed ? Basically, is it safe to switch to RHL 7 for development 
> purposes ? Presently I use RHL 6.2 with 2.2.14 kernel.

I do all my kernel development with gcc 2.96-69 and 2.96-81 (the errata
7.0 and the 7.1 gcc).