From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 May 2001 19:02:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 May 2001 19:01:59 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:20499 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 12 May 2001 19:01:47 -0400 Subject: Re: How can I help with VIA MVP3 problems? To: plr@udgaard.com (Peter Rasmussen (udgaard)) Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 23:58:01 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, plr@udgaard.com In-Reply-To: <200105121737.TAA09893@udgaard.com> from "Peter Rasmussen (udgaard)" at May 12, 2001 07:37:23 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I have done some tests and my conclusion of the tests below is that there > is an odd slowdown when compiling kernels, but not anything measurable when > runnig Livid OMS. As Alan says my VIA MVP3 chipset is older and shouldn't have > the previosuly mentioned problems. > > real 11m22.448s > user 10m39.480s > sys 0m42.700s > > MemShared: 0 kB <---- Why is this zero? Is it a problem? No just no longer accounted. > The same for compiling the exact same 2.4.4-ac8 kernel while running 2.2.16 > real 8m26.279s > user 7m8.630s > sys 0m39.260s And the config looks sane. Yep I'd say thats the VM balancing problems Alan