From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 16:13:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 16:13:29 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:44554 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 16:13:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code To: viro@math.psu.edu (Alexander Viro) Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 21:07:52 +0100 (BST) Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), rmk@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King), rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca (Richard Gooch), matthew@wil.cx (Matthew Wilcox), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), clausen@gnu.org (Andrew Clausen), bcrl@redhat.com (Ben LaHaise), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Alexander Viro" at May 20, 2001 03:42:53 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > How about sprintf(s + strlen(s), foo)? Solar Designer said two years ago we should be using snprintf in the kernel. He was most decidedly right 8)